Paul Ryan Predicts Enough GOP Support For 'Constructive Immigration Reform'

Breitbart ^ | 11/6/14 | Tony Lee

[jimbo123]

[VRWC For Truth]

Pathetic.

[chris37]

Don’t want it, don’t need it, stuff it.

[goldstategop]

Hell no - I’m against amnesty, period!

The GOP gang can choke on it.

[montag813]

Who gives a shit what Ryan has to say. No one elected him anything, and the caucus is not with his left-wing views.

[ought-six]

The only immigration reform we need is simply to enforce the immigration laws we now have.

[Norm Lenhart]

Predicted. Promised. And nearly delivered.

No matter what.

[ripley]

Maybe there’s a place for constructive immigration reform where the sun doesn’t shine.

IMHO

[Fungi]

That didn’t take long.

[Viennacon]

Paul is doing the old shamnesty shake

[cotton1706]

Do they never stop???

They just won a MASSIVE victory without pandering to the illegals! But I guess they have to pay off their donors.

[ripley]

“The only immigration reform we need is simply to enforce the immigration laws we how have.”

BINGO!

Give than man a si-gar.

IMHO

[jwalsh07]

I predict amnesty will lead to the end of the republican party.

[Vaquero]

Another useless POS RINO. Ready to grasp defeat from the jaws of victory.

[Rocko]

Let it go, Pee Wee.

[Uncle Miltie]

Paul Ryan on Amnesty: Not a Matter of ‘If’ but ‘When’

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/03/26/Paul-Ryan-on-Amnesty-Not-a-Matter-of-If-but-When

[Norm Lenhart]

Yup. 2 years from now all the people bitching that voted RINO this time will do it again. Some end.

[Old Sarge]

The only immigration reform we need is simply to enforce the immigration laws we now have.

[uncitizen]

FUPR

[kevao]

When Pelosi had a majority in the House in 2007, the GOP leadership couldn’t deliver to her even the small number of Republicans she needed to get amnesty passed. There are far fewer Dems in the House now. And as for the Republican reps today, they are if anything more conservative than in 2007.

I think Ryan is in for a surprise.