Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2/3rds of NJ voters back Christie’s decision to quarantine Ebola nurse Kaci Hickox
Hotair ^ | 11/7/2014 | Noah Rothman

Posted on 11/07/2014 8:12:15 AM PST by SeekAndFind

If you only watched the press’s coverage the week before suspected Ebola carrier nurse Kaci Hickox determined to make a martyr of herself by refusing to abide by even voluntary quarantining regulations in her home state of Maine, you would have thought she was a political prisoner of the aspiring Caesar, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie.

Hickox became a media celebrity when she insisted that her mandatory quarantine amounted to a violation of both her human and constitutional rights, and that Christie, her implicit abuser, could be subject to legal action as a result. The press, as they are wont to do when dubious accusations of malicious conduct involving Christie arise, ate it up.

Responding to the conventional wisdom inside the nation’s newsrooms that Christie had committed a blunder, Today show anchor Matt Lauer pressed Christie to consider whether he had met his match in Hickox.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

“Is it possible that you’re the wrong side of science here but the right side of public opinion?” Lauer pressed. The Today anchor and his producers might have laughed along with Jon Stewart who reflexively insisted that Christie’s decision to prevent Hickox from taking public transportation after arriving in the United States from West Africa was just an example of him being “such a dick about everything.” New Jersey’s voters were not laughing along.

While only 26 percent of New Jersey voters believe the spread of Ebola is a major threat to the state, according to a poll conducted by the University of Monmouth, 37 percent believe the federal government has appropriately responded to the spread of Ebola to the United States. That figure includes 56 percent of self-identified Garden State Democrats and another 69 percent of Republicans. Moreover, a full two-thirds back Christie’s decision to isolate Hickox whether she approved or not. Only 19 percent disapproved of this action.

“Gov. Christie has made a good read of how uneasy the public is with the seemingly uncertain response from the feds,” said Monmouth University Polling Institute director Patrick Murray. “The Ebola issue has offered him an opportunity to take on the mantle of leadership.”

Republicans (84%) and independents (71%) are more likely than Democrats (49%) to agree with this move. Garden State voters are more divided on the action taken a few days later to allow the nurse to return to her home state of Maine – 38% support this subsequent move and 40% disapprove. Republicans are more likely to disapprove (56%) than approve (25%) of allowing the nurse to return home whereas more Democrats approve (45%) than disapprove (29%). Independents are split between those who approve (42%) of releasing the nurse from her New Jersey quarantine and those who disapprove (39%).

Whatever you think of the Garden State’s governor, and many on the right and the left have a strong and unfavorable opinion of Christie, it is hard not to concede that the press is guilty of uncritical like-think whenever Christie is embroiled in a controversy. The press underestimates him. They believe he is diminished after L’Affair Bridge, and conservative politicians thrive under those conditions.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: chrischristie; ebola; kacihickox; newjersey

1 posted on 11/07/2014 8:12:15 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
And the NJ voters are right on the money. A few weeks of quarantine is a small price to pay to insure the safety of others from a deadly disease. Let's face it, for people my age, the fatality rate is damn near 100%, so I'm not feeling the love for Kaci’s selfish stunt.
2 posted on 11/07/2014 8:16:29 AM PST by July4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: July4

I never check social media,but on her I did. She was getting hammered probably 8 to 2 against her!


3 posted on 11/07/2014 8:18:40 AM PST by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
At first I supported a three week quarantine.

Then she - a nurse - started lecturing us on epidemiology as if she were an expert.

At that point I supported a three month quarantine.

Then she violated her voluntary quarantine in Maine.

I now support a three year quarantine for her.

4 posted on 11/07/2014 8:19:14 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Given the over 50% fatality rate of Ebola, I’d rather be way safe than sorry.


5 posted on 11/07/2014 8:26:04 AM PST by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Ursus
I never check social media,but on her I did. She was getting hammered probably 8 to 2 against her!

They even made fun of her on the CMA awards ( at the 3:33 mark )

CMA Awards

6 posted on 11/07/2014 8:32:07 AM PST by TheCipher (Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself. Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yeah? Anyone ask them what they think of his caving to the administration and releasing her back into the general populace before the quarantine period was over?


7 posted on 11/07/2014 8:48:11 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndreconmarine; Fitzcarraldo; Covenantor; Mother Abigail; EBH; Dog Gone; ...
Ping...

A link to this thread has been posted on the Ebola Surveillance Thread

8 posted on 11/08/2014 12:57:27 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Thanks for the ping!


9 posted on 11/08/2014 7:47:52 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; neverdem; ProtectOurFreedom; Mother Abigail; EBH; vetvetdoug; Smokin' Joe; ...
The same 2/3 who didn't vote?...

If a quarantine saves just one child's life, it's worth it.


Bring out your dead! The Dark Man cometh! Bring out your dead! The Dark Man cometh! Bring out your......

(Since all records of obama's past were lost in a tragic boating accident and fire, no one can be certain that the guy in the red circle isn't him...)

Post to me or FReep mail to be on/off the Bring Out Your Dead ping list.

The purpose of the “Bring Out Your Dead” ping list (formerly the “Ebola” ping list) is very early warning of emerging pandemics, as such it has a high false positive rate.

So far the false positive rate is 100%.

At some point we may well have a high mortality pandemic, and likely as not the “Bring Out Your Dead” threads will miss the beginning entirely.

*sigh* Such is life, and death...

10 posted on 11/10/2014 6:05:52 AM PST by null and void (If a quarantine saves just one child's life, it's worth it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson