Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justices to hear challenge to health law subsidies
AP ^ | Nov 7, 2014 | MARK SHERMAN

Posted on 11/07/2014 10:12:28 AM PST by BAW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Sirius Lee
"Really? Past performance is usually the best indicator of future performance."

There is no past performance, it's a new issue.

It isn't the court's job to decide in advance what outcome they want and rule accordingly, and that's not what they do. They decide specific issues. The fact that Roberts decided a different issue that had the effect of upholding Obamacare does not mean that he's somehow inclined to always uphold Obamacare regardless of what issue is being decided.

41 posted on 11/07/2014 3:49:35 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Yes but that would mean that the Federal employees in black robes would have to actually read the law rather than just procrastinate their ideological and political desires.

Its very clear that they see themselves not congress as the true power of Washington on what is law. That is why it really doesn’t matter what laws congress writes only what they fund, and increasinly not even that. We have a lot of dictators in the Federal injustice system.


42 posted on 11/07/2014 3:50:04 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BAW

Scalia, Alito, Kennedy and Thomas probably feel confident that Roberts is persuadable on this one hence they’re agreeing to take it up. Roberts went astray on the individual mandate but he did vote with the conservatives on the state Medicaid expansion and Hobby Lobby cases.


43 posted on 11/08/2014 4:53:06 AM PST by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BAW

I can see no other course than to take the words as written and deny the subsidies where there are no state exchanges

The question will then become must the receivers of illegal subsidies make restitution...... i.e. pay them back

The result of taking the case will be massive confusion as no action taken between now and the decision can be certain


44 posted on 11/08/2014 4:58:10 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... Obama is public enemy #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

I don’t think ‘pay back’ will ever come up. But the end to the subsidies will be almost immediate....within a couple of weeks. So imagine hundreds of thousands of people getting a notice in the mail...their cost went up by double, and it’s effective within sixty days. They’d all quit.

The President will ramble on about how we need to fix this...but it’s just not fixable. This entire problem goes back to 2,000 pages of text which no one read or understood.


45 posted on 11/09/2014 10:57:04 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson