To: Behind Liberal Lines
Good judge for slapping down the f***** who have been kidnapping babies since the early NAMBLA years
2 posted on
11/10/2014 7:41:18 PM PST by
Viennacon
(Obola is a muslim terrorist & his viral illegals need to be deported NOW!)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
A court invoking biological reality ?
Shocking!
3 posted on
11/10/2014 7:42:00 PM PST by
Kozak
("It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal" Henry Kissinger)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
A married same-sex couple cannot use a marital statute to block a man's paternity petition for the child he fathered with one of the spouses during the women's marriage, a Family Court judge has determined.I'm not even going to try to understand that sentence. I just accept that we've gone down the rabbit hole. I'm just trying to remember how Alice got out. Or did she?
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Despite a nearly incomprehensible opening sentence, it sounds as if this was one of the few recent court decisions that is halfway sane.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
You mean you can’t just wish upon a star and make all your perverse dreams come true? There is an actual reality to the world of biology and gender and reproduction?
6 posted on
11/10/2014 7:42:57 PM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
No problem. Kennedy will save them.
7 posted on
11/10/2014 7:44:56 PM PST by
fwdude
(The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
8 posted on
11/10/2014 7:45:25 PM PST by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Why any man would agree to father a baby with a lesbian couple is beyond me.
9 posted on
11/10/2014 7:46:06 PM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
This is going to piss off the Left to no end. In their warped minds, the “supplier” of the sperm for a baby does not have any rights to it. Whether husband, boyfriend, sperm donor.
10 posted on
11/10/2014 7:48:03 PM PST by
CatOwner
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I love it.....just wish more would do this...seek paternity that is....
11 posted on
11/10/2014 7:48:29 PM PST by
cherry
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Call it what they will, biology is the reality and does not change. Reproduction requires a male and a female.
15 posted on
11/10/2014 7:52:16 PM PST by
kalee
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Gays are going to start demanding that they have babies out their rear ends.
16 posted on
11/10/2014 7:54:22 PM PST by
Telepathic Intruder
(The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
He is just going to end up paying child support.
17 posted on
11/10/2014 7:56:54 PM PST by
mylife
To: Behind Liberal Lines
A married same-sex coupleShould read "A same-sex couple with a fraudulent marriage certificate".
To: Behind Liberal Lines
...it does not require the court to "ignore the obvious biological differences between husbands and wives." "Don't you opress me!"
26 posted on
11/10/2014 8:12:52 PM PST by
ElkGroveDan
(My tagline is in the shop.)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
That should be obvious. There is a man involved somewhere.
33 posted on
11/10/2014 8:55:05 PM PST by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
>> A married same-sex couple cannot use a marital statute to block a man’s paternity petition for the child he fathered with one of the spouses during the women’s marriage...
Initially assuming the “same-sex” was male, the opening sentence was a mind bender.
34 posted on
11/10/2014 9:32:01 PM PST by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Click the pic to the full-text Free Republic thread.
44 posted on
11/11/2014 4:48:26 AM PST by
Travis McGee
(www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson