Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Moore: In Defense of My Friend Bill Maher's Statements on Islam
Reader Supported News ^ | 11/14/2014 | Michael Moore

Posted on 11/15/2014 10:45:25 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Bill Maher is a friend of mine. He stood up for me when I was attacked after my Oscar speech (given on the fourth night of the Iraq War, a war Bill publicly opposed while 70% of the country, including the majority of Democrats in the U.S. Senate, supported it), and I stood up for him when ABC fired him and cancelled his show when he attempted to stop the hysteria and fear-mongering after 9-11 -- resulting in the Bush White House publicly ordering him to watch what he says -- or else. When Bill got his HBO show, he went on a 7-year tear against the Bush administration and became one of our most unapologetic and unrelenting voices against the insanity being shoved down our throats.

I, for one, am glad there's at least one top comedian who isn't afraid to say the word "capitalism" or give credence to the good of socialism. You may not agree with Bill on everything. Yet I'm guessing you love it when he goes after the Uterun Police/Protectors of Child Rapists (also known as The Vatican), or when he brilliantly satirizes the crazy Christian Right which has controlled much of our politics for the past 33 years. I certainly do.

But when Bill goes after Islam, or crazy people professing to be Muslim, we grow uncomfortable. Why is that? Because when he bravely ridicules and attacks Christian assassins of abortion doctors who cite the Bible as justification for their evil acts, we heartily applaud him. But when he mercilessly stomps on Islamic assassins who cite the Koran, we grow uneasy. Why the switch on our part? Is it because Bill doesn't just stop with the Islamic assassins -- he thinks anyone who follows the Koran is a bit nuts? Or the Bible or the Talmud or the... you name it. He thinks it's all coo coo for cocoa puffs.

I have, when I'm on Bill's show, told him there are far more examples historically of the death and destruction that Christians have brought to the planet, from the Crusades to the Inquisition to the wiping out of Native Americans to the Holocaust. But he points out that, in truth, the Jesus followers seem to have taken a break lately in their genocidial lust -- and that the debate should be about the present; i.e., which religion is now doing most of the terrorizing?

Though I would maintain that it is still the Judeo-Christian West whose armies and banks and institutions keep much of the third world under a heavy economic boot, resulting in a lot of hunger, suffering and death, Bill asks, "If I draw a cartoon of Jesus in a dress, will Christian leaders issue a call to assassinate me?"

I can't speak to Bill's drawing skills, but it's safe to say that in the USA he can draw whatever he wants. In fact, other than those murdered abortion doctors, a hundred bombed or ransacked Planned Parenthood clinics and a few people like me, there are not many activists or artists who have to worry about Baptists blowing up their homes. Sinead O'Connor was not beheaded for beheading a photo of the Pope on NBC. Your middle name can be 'Hussein' and you can still win the state of Virginia if you're running for President.

Sure, I can make a daily list of all the horrible things so-called Christians still do in this country. Rarely, though, do their actions involve decapitation.

But if you're a Dutch filmmaker who makes a movie about violence against women in some Islamic countries, or if you're a Danish cartoonist who draws an image making fun of the Prophet -- well, you are then either shot to death or you are now in hiding.

So if Bill is taking the same exact position liberals usually take whenever we see free speech being threatened, or women being abused or people forced to submit to fundamentalist dictates, why then is he facing any criticism for speaking out against these wrongs? When Christians do these things we speak up -- loudly. So why not speak out when Muslims do it? 'Cause it's none of our business? Isn't it?

I think I may have a couple answers as to why some liberals are uncomfortable with Bill's humor when it comes to Islam:

1. We have witnessed, since 9/11, Arabs and Muslims in this country undergoing huge amounts of prejudice, bigotry and sometimes outright violence. This sickens us (as I know it does Bill). So we are extra sensitive to what sounds like, as it goes through the liberal filter in our ears, any "anti-Arab" comments. We don't want to hear anything even remotely anti-Muslim. But we have to be careful that this doesn't stop us from listening to legitimate criticisms about things that go on in the Muslim world. I just think that, due to our illegal actions (invasions) of the past decade, our government lacks any moral authority on this and should be forbidden from any attempts to "fix" those problems.

2. Liberals are intensely fed up with these two wars against mostly Muslim populations (not to mention the indiscriminate drone strikes on at least four other nations). And now the party that won the elections last Tuesday would like a war with Iran. An ignorant American public was manipulated with fear and lies to start and maintain the Afghanistan and Iraq Wars -- and that manipulation continues today in order to justify things like the mass spying by the NSA on our entire citizenry. When the Cold War ended (25 years ago today in Berlin), the defense industry went berserk with worry that their salad days were over. A new enemy was needed. Arab terrorists fit the bill perfectly! Not only has the defense industry since thrived, a whole new fake industry has arisen -- the Homeland Security behemoth. As our infrastructure, our freedoms and our middle class vaporize, billions are spent as a grossly out-of-proportion response to a few shitty disasters.

So we liberals don't want to hear another word about an "Islamic threat" or some non-existent Iranian nukes or... or whatever! We know we're being set up to get behind another war effort, another arms race, another diversion intended to make the point-one-percenters even filthier rich -- and the rest of us distracted with false fears and hatreds.

I don't even know if I want to see Jon Stewart's new film about the Iranian who was unjustly imprisoned. WHY not? It's a true story! It happened! But the liberal panic button says this film will be used in ways to pump up fear of Muslims. At the very least, it will be the first thing Jon Stewart has done that the Republicans will like. So does that mean he shouldn't have made it?

Two weeks ago on Bill's HBO show, he had on the wonderful Palestinian writer Rula Jebreal. They had a good and testy back and forth (Bill often has Muslims who disagree with him on his show, like the great Ben al-Afleck). Rula was giving it to Bill pretty hard, but when he paused and asked her if he were a Muslim, living in certain Muslim countries, and he walked into the Men's Club one day and announced he was now a Presbyterian, would that be ok? She paused, and then said "No."

Comedy is and should be a dangerous business. Those comedians who play it safe are far less interesting, less funny and, frankly, are often boring. Those who are willing to take their comedy to the Line That Shall Not Be Crossed -- and maybe step over it from time to time -- are the ones we are drawn to. But in order to encourage them to take those chances, we have to give them some leeway, give them a break when, in our mind, they've crossed that line. To not do so is to encourage them to go toward the bland, the passe and to the non-offensive. Those comedians like Bill Maher who are willing to take the risk of being the court jester -- saying the things that the rest of us are often thinking (or wish we were thinking) but are afraid to say -- should be supported, not silenced.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: billmaher; crusades; islam; michaelmoore
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
If I understand Michael Moore's argument, this is what he's saying:

Historically, Christians have been responsible for more death and destruction than Muslims (e.g. the Crusades and the Inquisition). Therefore, we have no moral authority to criticize.

However, the actions of some Muslims in the name (mistakenly) of Islam deserve criticism.

1 posted on 11/15/2014 10:45:26 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What does the Bible say about the blind leading the blind? oh yeah, they both fall into the ditch.


2 posted on 11/15/2014 10:48:50 AM PST by fish hawk (no tyrant can remain in power without the consent and cooperation of his victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Moore is a boil in need of an epic lancing...


3 posted on 11/15/2014 10:51:30 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

Moore’s rant is a waste of space.


4 posted on 11/15/2014 10:52:08 AM PST by Sasparilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

rofl...


5 posted on 11/15/2014 10:53:16 AM PST by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind


6 posted on 11/15/2014 10:59:07 AM PST by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bill Maher is a vile scumbag and Moore is too


7 posted on 11/15/2014 11:00:42 AM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
If you understand Moore's argument, you're as ignorant of history as he is.

The Crusades were wars of self-defense against an attempted Muslim takeover of Europe. The Inquisition was an attempt to save lives after secular kings set up heresy trials that resulted in subjects being executed without trials.

Muslims are estimated to have slaughtered 270 million in 14 centuries:

http://ed4444.tumblr.com/post/9078777434/the-lie-that-muslims-have-killed-270-million

Actually, according to Vox Day in THE IRRATIONAL ATHEIST, atheist regimes in the 20th Century alone killed and murdered about 153.3 million people for philosophical, political and economic reasons, while in 2,000 years people mis-representing the Christian faith killed and murdered only about 1.65 million, or 93 times less the number of people in 20 centuries compared to only one century!!!

Democide* Statistics, Christianity vs. Atheism

Atheist Democide in 1 century - 153.36 million people

Christian Democide in 20 centuries - 1.65 million people

* Democide includes genocide, political killings and murders, and mass murder.

8 posted on 11/15/2014 11:02:40 AM PST by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I have, when I'm on Bill's show, told him there are far more examples historically of the death and destruction that Christians have brought to the planet, from the Crusades to the Inquisition to the wiping out of Native Americans to the Holocaust. But he points out that, in truth, the Jesus followers seem to have taken a break lately in their genocidial lust -- and that the debate should be about the present; i.e., which religion is now doing most of the terrorizing?

You're insane, fat man.

What makes me uneasy is having you hold any position even remotely close to mine, so would you please just sing Islams praises from now on, you cholesterol addled imbecile?

9 posted on 11/15/2014 11:24:34 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
If I understand Michael Moore's argument, this is what he's saying:

Historically, Christians have been responsible for more death and destruction than Muslims (e.g. the Crusades and the Inquisition). Therefore, we have no moral authority to criticize.

However, the actions of some Muslims in the name (mistakenly) of Islam deserve criticism.


I didn't read it quite that way. Although Moore got in his predictable condemnations of Christianity, he said that he can't recall any Christians beheading anyone for criticizing them. Which is true, and therefore surprising coming from Moore.

In any event, as much as I loathe the smarmy Maher and the blow-hard Moore, at least they've had their eyes opened to the irony of being able to smear Christians as fanatics in perfect safety because Christians aren't, in fact, fanatics. And they're being somewhat honest, at least, about the fact that Islam is the religion which threatens to kill them for speaking their minds. Two small liberal epiphanies, perhaps.
10 posted on 11/15/2014 11:25:11 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"Michael Moore, the fat bastard..."


11 posted on 11/15/2014 11:27:13 AM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

The Crusades are under perpetual assault because they can’t have Christians inspired by a successful defense of Christendom.

Professional liars like Moore know what the truth is. He has to. He’s at war with it.


12 posted on 11/15/2014 11:30:53 AM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (The greatest trick the Soviets ever pulled was convincing the world they didn't exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How’s that weight loss diet going for you Michael?


13 posted on 11/15/2014 11:33:25 AM PST by TruthWillWin (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

14 posted on 11/15/2014 11:36:29 AM PST by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; GeronL

Has Michael Moron even BEEN to the Middle East yet? He had a second unit crew shoot video in Iraq (where they bumped into Nick Berg before he was kidnapped and decapitated by Islamonazis “freedom fighters against Imperialist Bush”). He had third party go betweens arrange the distribution deal for Lebanon (terrorist) funding...


15 posted on 11/15/2014 11:41:24 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
examples historically of the death and destruction that Christians have brought to the planet, from the Crusades...

Stop right there.

What caused the Crusades? To what were the Crusades a response? What population was being persecuted and slaughtered BEFORE the Crusaders took the field to put a stop to it?

Where is the largest and most beautiful Christian cathedral on the planet? Is it a cathedral today? Why not? Who seized it and desecrated it?

Who, knowing the facts, would not praise and give thanks to the CHRISTIAN Crusaders who know how to deal with Islam?

16 posted on 11/15/2014 11:43:07 AM PST by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

That is very interesting


17 posted on 11/15/2014 11:44:48 AM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t agree that Christians have been responsible for more deaths than moozlums historically. What are you references for this? What this statement just pulled out of a dark place?


18 posted on 11/15/2014 12:30:19 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Though I would maintain that it is still the Judeo-Christian West whose armies and banks and institutions keep much of the third world under a heavy economic boot, resulting in a lot of hunger, suffering and death...

The calories required to sustain Michael Moore alone in his benighted life of corpulent and crapulent excess would alleviate hunger in a significant proportion of the famine victims in the world.

Hey Michael - isn't it way past time for you to indulge in that single, wafer-thin mint? Why don't you oink about it, m'kay?

19 posted on 11/15/2014 1:18:38 PM PST by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why would anybody read this past the headline?


20 posted on 11/15/2014 1:25:09 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson