Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will Republicans put climate science back on trial?
The Hill ^ | November 16, 2014 | Timothy Cama

Posted on 11/16/2014 12:40:42 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
to attack the science behind climate change

I agree, we attack the non-science of the hoax, because the real "science" is that big yellow spot in the daytime sky.

21 posted on 11/16/2014 1:09:11 PM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Climate junk science


22 posted on 11/16/2014 1:09:11 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Isn’t science always on trial?


23 posted on 11/16/2014 1:14:09 PM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Need to be more specific. Are we putting on trial:
Science hoke us, or
Science poke us?
Inquiring minds want to know...


24 posted on 11/16/2014 1:14:30 PM PST by Migraine (Diversity is great -- until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: molson209

If the GOP can put ‘climate science’ on trial, why not also take a good look at the disaster called Islam before it will destroy the country?

Or would such a discussion be politically too unpleasant?

Climate change will not kill us but Islam certainly will.

Just ask the Syrian and Iraqi Christians who have inhabited that land since the first century long before there were any Muslims.


25 posted on 11/16/2014 1:18:14 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

“Getting answers that you want to believe is ideology or religion.”

Amen, brother.


26 posted on 11/16/2014 1:22:06 PM PST by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The very first sentence of this screed betrays the fact that the primary purpose behind “climate science” is stricter environmental policy.


27 posted on 11/16/2014 1:44:54 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
I would just quietly cut off all the funding.

That was my exact thought when I read this. There's no way to discuss the issue rationally anymore, so don't even bring it up.

28 posted on 11/16/2014 1:53:28 PM PST by palmer (Free is when you don't have to pay for nothing. Or do nothing. We want Obamanet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: palmer; Cowboy Bob

I agree too, but I do not really see Boehner or McConnell wanting to cut anything.


29 posted on 11/16/2014 1:54:29 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DnPRK

“Don’t Gruber Me, Bro!”


30 posted on 11/16/2014 1:55:26 PM PST by UNGN (I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Good question. The Feds getting involved in matters that should not concern them, as usual.


31 posted on 11/16/2014 2:05:51 PM PST by yellowdoghunter (Welcome to Obamastan! (Mrs. Yellowdoghunter))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

I think the primary purpose behind “Crimate Science” is “Crony Capitalism” and the redistribution of OPM (Other People’s Money).

GE, for example, will make Trillions of dollars off scaring Democrats that their cities will flood if we don’t “Do Something!!!!!!”. GE will give tax exempt Billions to media outlets to spread the phony fear and in turn will provide Government sponsored solutions to a world crying out for them.


32 posted on 11/16/2014 2:07:21 PM PST by UNGN (I've been here since '98 but had nothing to say until now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

“back on trial”? Hll, kids, it’s never been an accepted religion to anyone but the liberal Luddites.


33 posted on 11/16/2014 2:11:06 PM PST by CodeToad (Islam should be outlawed and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Socon-Econ

Absolutely. We need the truth of the matter exposed just like the implementation of Affordable Care Act has been lately. Just how gullible are the American people?


34 posted on 11/16/2014 2:11:37 PM PST by CC-slave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob
I would just quietly cut off all the funding. If they complain, then just ignore them.

Agreed.

35 posted on 11/16/2014 2:27:16 PM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Will Michael Mann and Phil Jones allow peer-reviewed journals to publish papers that contradict AGW?


36 posted on 11/16/2014 3:23:49 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Any energy source that requires a subsidy is, by definition, "unsustainable.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

“But some GOP strategists wonder whether such an offensive might backfire.”

What GOP strategists? Give us some names. Any GOP strategist who suggests this should be urine tested for smoking drugs.


37 posted on 11/16/2014 3:35:20 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

The Church of Settled Science. They are so eager to sacrifice life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness (along with mankind itself) on the altar of global warming.

Since when does exposing lies hurt the cause of freedom?


38 posted on 11/16/2014 4:55:28 PM PST by bobo1 (progressives=commies/fascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Will Republicans put climate science manufactured hysteria back on trial?

Begin with cutting the head off the snake.
Evict the traitør maggøt @ 1600 first, then isolate/eliminate the other bureacratic usurpations in their turn.

39 posted on 11/16/2014 5:16:38 PM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

No need to attack man made global warming “scientists”. Just cut off their funding, the matter will go away.


40 posted on 11/16/2014 5:31:12 PM PST by Dapper 26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson