LOL but great idea. Isn’t the temporary nature of ownership in the Constitution, though? Had something to do with sharing scientific knowledge for the benefit of the people?
We all benefit from the knowledge and the creation in some way, but the creator enjoys additional substance in exchange for his efforts. Our forefathers did indeed use the words “limited time” in these matters. Well, time is naturally limited to that point when the Creator folds things into something new. Anyway, I question our forefathers as to why they thought it necessary, and how strongly they felt about this limitation. It is something we are free to hash out. It is also something - like anything - that is subject to excesses in either direction. To me it seems commercial success ought to play into how long a given creation is allowed copyright protection.
Don’t forget that copyright protects you too, not just the copyright holder. It’s similar to a brand name. When you buy a book under copyright, you are assured that you are reading what the author wrote, not some distorted version. Copyright law is a true double-edged sword that shouldn’t be swung too far in either direction.
Different issue.