Skip to comments.
The New G.O.P. Showdown Threat (NYT editorial)
New York Times ^
| November 27, 2014
Posted on 11/28/2014 5:24:12 AM PST by reaganaut1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: Lazamataz
You’re right. I do. He does. His teeth gnash.
41
posted on
11/28/2014 8:21:53 AM PST
by
Savage Beast
(Hubris and denial overwhelm Western Civilization. Nemesis and tragedy always follow.)
To: txrefugee
I hardly think the shutdown led to the landside in November. Probably more due to the events that happened AFTERWARDS, i.e., 0-CARE, IRS, ISIS, BERGDAHL, OBOLA, etc.
All that combined made our Dear Leader look a little less dear in the eyes of many--but impeaching him would elevate him back up to the "victim-status" that they have all been indoctrinated to feel very, very sorry for.
But--turn 0's tactics back on him and make him be the WON to LOSE by having to veto spending bills that have amendments attached to them he doesn't like.
Not as exciting as an impeachment process--but still possibly a death by many cuts.
42
posted on
11/28/2014 8:37:13 AM PST
by
milagro
(There is no peace in appeasement!)
To: reaganaut1
I wouldn’t wipe my dog’s a** with the NYtimes.
43
posted on
11/28/2014 4:07:32 PM PST
by
Impy
(They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
To: reaganaut1
Kinda odd....addressing correctly at first, Senator Sessions....then reverting to “Mr Sessions”?
For a mature newspaper....supposedly recognized around the US....it’s an odd mistake. They have folks hired to proof-read everything they print, and it actually made it past them? I don’t buy it.
It was a slanted piece of journalism. Nothing new....but it’s obvious....they’ve gone from some respected journalist operation to some high-school paper standard.
To: pepsionice
Kinda odd....addressing correctly at first, Senator Sessions....then reverting to Mr Sessions? That's per the NYT stylebook. On articles mentioning the president, he will first be referred to as President Obama. Thereafter, it will be Mr. Obama.
It's not a mistake.
45
posted on
11/29/2014 1:42:07 AM PST
by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
To: reaganaut1
Dem majority is a mandate, Repub majority is in the way of Dems.
Heads Dems win, Tails Repubs lose. msm BS.
46
posted on
11/29/2014 2:25:06 AM PST
by
MaxMax
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
To: only1percent
BS! Defeatists have no place in hard politics, which would be Boehner as prime example.
History will sort it out, we cannot have this punk ruling with impunity.
47
posted on
11/29/2014 2:32:17 AM PST
by
MaxMax
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
To: armydawg505
To: reaganaut1
But... but wasn’t it Obama’s spokesperson who threaten to ‘shut down’ the government?
49
posted on
12/02/2014 2:56:41 PM PST
by
skeeter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson