Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TurboZamboni

I think the key here is whether or not the provide accommodation for other employees with temporary work restrictions. If they do, I don’t see how they avoid providing similar accommodations to pregnant women. On the other hand, if they do not provide accommodations for other employees with temporary limitations, then they should not be forced to provide them for pregnant women.

That is not saying they should not have a way to provide temporary light duty for employees where possible - it is a way to keep good employees who may be injured or otherwise incapable of working at full capacity for a short time. But they should not be forced to do so.


24 posted on 12/03/2014 1:03:39 PM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative

I find it hard to believe in the life of UPS they’ve never had a pregnant driver before.

I wonder how they handled it before now?


26 posted on 12/03/2014 1:05:58 PM PST by TurboZamboni (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson