If they’re starting to acknowledge the problems, at least they can do that. Most Liberals think it was the greatest thing ever..., no problems at all.
What interests me about these freaks, is that they started this whole thing to cover the 45 million without coverage. Now they acknowledge about 50 million will remain without coverage.
Hey, but no problem. And never-mind that illegals will be covered by lower middle class will be part of the 50 million.
Obamacare raised the cost with all these mandates but the taxpayer subsidies were supposed to compensate for that but naturally they have have these hole-traps like ones cited.
I don't comply with tyrant's demands.
Until recently, ultranannyist liberal Joan Claybrook, yes, that Claybrook, was on their board.
Consumer Reports is surprised that communism is not working this time too. I would not buy a magazine from such idiots.
The keep kids till 26 is likely one part of this garbage most folks like
I’ve got family of 7 with my oldest daughter dropping off soon....the fact that major medical catastrophic style insurance is dead hurts her
I used to pay 470 Pre Obama...self insured with Farm Bureau BCBS
now I pay 780...to be up to Obamacaremandates which includes bull white like pregnancy coverage for my just turned menopausal honeypot
Back in our early days it was her age of childbearing that drove policy premiums
It was that way for all families...that had the decency to carry insurance and not expect govt to do it
“I guess the magazine must be run by clueless liberals. “
Really? You can check the history of that mag here and you’ll see countless idiot articles from glow-bull warming to worshipping electric cars.
I used to listen to those CR clowns years ago, but no more. Their “research” is a joke.
So “affordable” is now whatever the Füher says is affordable.
You didn't know that? It's why I cancelled my subscription back in the early '90s. Worse, when they do report on things you're shopping for the model you want is either out of date and is no longer available or has been totally redesigned so the review doesn't apply. Total waste of time and money IMO.
Like I said, there are just as MANY (if not more) people without health insurance now than before Klown We Don’t Kare. It’s just now they are DIFFERENT. People.
Glitch. Unexpected?
I canceled my subscription when they put Obama on the cover
Boo hoo, I’m paying $1500/month now.
Son started a new job. He took a huge pay cut when he left his seasonal job with no benefits. He just found out that his insurance will be 47.00 a paycheck. If he adds his wife and baby, it jumps to $400.00 a pay. That is most of his income!
Time to repeal the cursed failure of a ‘healthcare’ law!
not mentioned is that is for insurance, not for actual health care, which requires hundreds or thousands more in copays and deductibles
As a seasonal paid EA tax preparer, a LARGE amount of my training is being devoted to the vagaries and special conditions of the ACA(s) and their tax implications. I predict that there will be stunned faces as the willfully and conditionally ignorant find the penalties kicking in on their EITC refunds. I am looking forward to seeing what the new IRS quote will be for the ‘average’ preparation time for 2014 taxes by the individual. Major problems will come from persons getting “MARKETPLACE” (Federal/State) subsidized insurance who have marriage/divorce/life-change events in 2014. These trigger amazing amounts of work to accommodate to the IRS regulations given the MONTHLY computations of the ACA regs!
I don’t see that Obamacare is Consumer Reports’ business. I might need to rethink my subscription. Mission creep.
That said, the spouse insurance in that case is only $275 a month. That is a good deal. The income is irrelevant. It should not be an entitlement.