Being a Bush appointee is no guarantee the judge will rule in favor of the states. A good number of Bush judicial appointees/nominees have turned out to be liberal socialist traitors who ignore the Constitution.
John Roberts comes to mind.
Hanen is great! I wrote about him on my blog in contrast to Hecht a TX Supreme court judge seeking legal help for the UAC’s.
http://www.stopthemagnet.com/blog/hanen-vs-hecht-criminal-conspiracy-or-access-justice
Read past the headline: a Bush appointee who issued a scorching rebuke to the Department of Homeland Security last year, accusing it of refusing to follow border security laws.
Per the information in the article, there’s more to him than being a “Bush appointee” - it’s how he has ruled on previous similar cases.