Posted on 12/07/2014 9:03:53 PM PST by Nachum
I certainly agree with that - I don’t even go there any more.
I’ve read and heard about the ‘trickery’ and how it strengthens Obama’s EO, but exactly how? I can’t seem to find the specifics. Are there any? Or is this just someone’s assessment of something they haven’t (cannot) read?
Look, let’s focus here.
The Republicans want amnesty as much ad the Democrats. They’re all looking for the same thing. The Democrats want voters and the Republicans want cheap labor for their corporate buddies.
Call your representative and complain.
>> There is adblock software that is free. Works great
It does indeed, but when you adequately convey the spirit of the article, there’s no need to suffer the consequences of off-site material.
Remember, we FRamily for what’s here, not somewhere else on the Interwebs....
“””Remember, we FRamily for what’s here, not somewhere else on the Interwebs....”””
There really is nothing “here”, except for a few vanities and FReeper stories. The rest actually IS from the interwebs.
Can someone explain to me why any employer would want undereducated/uneducated peasants as employees? Does America still have that many jobs that only require a strong back and repetitive labor? I am seriously asking this question because I don’t see those jobs in the numbers being brought in.
I have been told by managers in IT that they dread the Indian programmers. Their work product is described as unnecessarily convoluted and they require much more supervision and revision. One commented he would hire anyone who didn’t have to be reminded to change the toner in the copy machine and who could actually do that, if such an employee were actually available.
I think perhaps the real power play here is the sending of monies to the South/Central American nations supplying these migrants. I know the Chamber of Commerce has played hardball to acquire these so-called workers and it truly baffles me. In the past, I have had employees and when I could no longer afford them I discovered that I got more done correctly in a shorter time without them. Nor did I miss the time and expense of filing their income/FICA-FUDA forms.
None of this makes sense to me. Yes, I understand that the donks think they are acquiring a compliant voter pool. How long do they think these new *citizens* are going to compliantly vote for old whites? As soon as they understand our system and how to play it, they are going to organize and elect their own. The present elite may think they have enough money to cushion them personally against that eventuality, but the political tiers just below the top must have the brains to understand the risk to their own careers.
I run Win-7 Pro x64, and use a CPU Meter Gadget, among a few others, and it explodes into frenzied, pin-the-needle activity for all 4 CPUs, while at Breitbart’s site. That sustained activity can’t be good for the hardware, so I don’t visit anymore either.
Well, that should make for 216 votes against noBoehner for SOH.
In the article Gohmert said that the secret amendment was added after the members read the one and a half page bill. Then the leadership kept this new amendment from the members, not allowing them to read it.
http://amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/YOHO_087_xml122141859175917.pdf
From the article:
Gohmert walked Breitbart News through the text of Section Three of the new bill line by line, explaining how each word fits into the legal patchwork of immigration law before getting to the key additions that were made without notifying many of the members who voted for it.
“They added another section called ‘exceptions.’ And the exceptions part says this ‘shall apply except’ and then there’s three parts,” Gohmert said while reading the actual text of the bill on the phone with Breitbart News.
The third one is “for humanitarian purposes where the aliens are at imminent risk of serious bodily harm or death.” That’s what they added. Well, this president has been arguing for months that the things he’s doing is because these people are at imminent risk of serious bodily harm and that’s why he’s doing them. So actually by adding this exception it gives the president for the first time a solid statutory basis to argue that providing those work permits is now legal.
Gohmert said that this addition gives President Obama a foot in the door for a legal argument justifying executive amnesty.
“By adding that exception to the original bill, we would now give the president the statutory authority to do what he’s doing to issue these work permits,” Gohmert said. “I know that this language is in there for people claiming asylum and for refugee status, but not ever for providing work permits. But by adding this to this bill that’s supposed to claim his effort to provide work permits is illegal, unconstitutional, and inappropriate, the exception that was added gives him a statutory basis for arguing his work permits are now statutorily allowed.”
As I see it, the exception is the rule. The new part of the bill is what they did not want anyone to see. The part they had not released inserts wording that grants an exception to the president so that he can ignore the fact that he is over reaching his powers if there are humanitarian reasons to do so.
Congress is abdicating their authority and giving their powers to the president, in other words the House has said it’s alright for the president to go beyond his Constitutional powers, when he feels there is humanitarian need.
This is the exact situation we have now with thousands of “youths” being allowed into our country because they are poor and there are drugs and crime in the countries where they live. There president never had that Constitutional authority before. The passage of this bill gives it to him.
This is precisely what that weasel Pete Sessions of Texas wanted when he started tinkering with things. I need to see some Texas politicians call that traitor out soon. He needs to be branded with his treason so no one ever forgets.
If you still have a problem understanding what is really going on, read the whole article again.
Legislation by itself does not automatically grant Constitutionality.
House GOP Leaders Trick Fraudulently Induce 216 House Republicans into Accidentally Inadvertently Supporting Obama's Executive Amnesty.
You may be correct, it does seem far worse.
The laws today that are unconstitutional but in effect are too numerous to count. If you can’t get a court to rule it’s unconstitutional, for all intents and purposes, it is constitutional and that is precisely how they will use it.
I don’t disagree with what you say. Today’s events are the result of lawlessness and cowardice of the opposition. It does not, however, negate the fact that the actions are not Constitutional on their face simply because they are the result of enacted legislation.
Eventually, common sense and decency will prevail. Or, we all lose and become a third world shithole.
Agree. Ditch the popups.
What makes you think Reid will not let this bill be voted on?
It gives a legal basis for Obola to do whatever he wants. Like the health provision in Roe. Open door.
Yes, he can proceed on that basis, but ultimately it is not a Constitutional ruling.
But then it has to go to court. That takes time and time is of the essence here, as the document cards are already being prepared. And as I have said elsewhere here, once the illegals have jobs, apartments, and bank accounts, it really would be inhuman to deport them. Now is the time to stop this, not when the legal groups get around to it and it wends its slow way through the court system.
It occurred to me that it is no anomaly that this was rushed through—while we still have a lame-duck Dem Senate.
You really don’t have an argument from me here. I am merely commenting on the specifics of legislated laws and whether they are actually Constitutionally valid or not.
Given our Supreme Court, our President and our spineless/ball-less RINO majority thus far, I’d be perfectly content with insurrection and open revolt.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.