“Like, the person that lured her to the party was a fraternity member who worked at the natatorium, and the fraternity & university were able to show that no member worked at the facility at that time.”
Right, so now the father of the girl is claiming his daughter simply got the frat house wrong.
One of her friends who went to pick her up on Sept. 28, 2012, says Jackie said that she was raped that very night but says there was no dress splattered with blood. How could Jackie get a detail like that wrong?
If all of the fraternities check - and I’m pretty sure this will happen now - if they had a member named Drew at that time who worked at the aquatic center and it turns out to be false, then what?
Now there are rumors that she claimed she was raped after her high school prom. This case is getting more bizarre by the minute.
It is clear now, however, that no gang rape of Jackie took place at Phi Psi. Her father is admitting that is the case. Did it happen elsewhere or not at all?
I think she’s probably one of those libs that thinks she’s doing something good by
“raising awareness”
with a “fake but accurate” story.
Can you point me in the direction of her father’s interview or that information? I haven’t seen that anywhere, but will start looking now.