Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Idaho_Cowboy

I am calling BS on this report. If its liquid fuel and can be dumped into the combustion chamber, it should work just fine in a jet engine. F35 engine may be new hi-tech, but its still a jet engine.


26 posted on 12/09/2014 11:03:30 AM PST by Magnum44 (I have had just about enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Magnum44

The interesting thing is that all the tactical jets I have flown have had an oil/fuel heat exchanger to preheat the fuel and cool the oil.


73 posted on 12/09/2014 12:40:38 PM PST by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44
I am calling BS on this report. If its liquid fuel and can be dumped into the combustion chamber, it should work just fine in a jet engine. F35 engine may be new hi-tech, but its still a jet engine.

The problem isn't in burning the fuel for propulsion - it's that the plane's systems which generate waste heat utilize the fuel supply like a heat sink. Having the fuel "pre-heated" causes electronic problems.

75 posted on 12/09/2014 12:53:43 PM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44

It is not the temperature of the fuel entering the engine. The fuel is used to cool the electronics.


91 posted on 12/13/2014 1:08:40 PM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson