Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Panic Inside the Beltway
rushlimbaugh.com ^ | 12-11-2014 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 12/11/2014 1:16:07 PM PST by servo1969

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: servo1969
If there is a government shutdown, the Republicans are gonna get blamed for it. It's the same old thing. Whatever happens on anything, the Republicans are gonna get blamed.

The reason the congresscritters are so afraid of a government shutdown? If the People saw that the shutdown made no difference in their lives, selling the People on more government would never work again.

We could eliminate all the three letter alphabet soup agencies and the country would be better, not worse. That is what the politicians fear.

21 posted on 12/11/2014 2:30:27 PM PST by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969; All
Regarding the constitutionally indefensible Dodd-Frank law, not only did Thomas Jefferson officially note that the states have never delegated to the feds, expressly via the Constitution, the specific power to regulate either banking or intrastate commerce, but the Supreme Court has also historically clarified that the states have never delegated to the feds the specific power to regulate intrastate commerce.

So if Elizabeth Warren really wants to protect the Dodd-Frank law then she needs to do the following. She needs to rally Congress to propose an amendment to the Constitution to the states which would grant Congress the speciifc powers to regulate both intrastate banking and intrastate commerce. And if the states choose to ratify Ms Warren’s amendment then Congress will have the power to regulate such issus and Ms Warren will be a hero.

22 posted on 12/11/2014 2:42:08 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
The fact that 90% of productive Americans are willing to violate the law should be getting mush more attention, in my opinion.

Resist we mush!


23 posted on 12/11/2014 3:16:03 PM PST by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Obstinate

“Bog Boy” LOL, I feel a new TV series coming.


24 posted on 12/11/2014 3:24:46 PM PST by DungeonMaster (No one can come to me unless the Father who sent Me draws him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
The only permanent solution would be to hang the Dems, the Republican "leadership" and their media lackeys on the Capitol steps and restore the limits on Federal power and spending envisaged in the Constitution.

             

After 30+yrs as a carpenter/cabinetmaker, it'd be an honor to help build a few dozen 'Liberty Trees' for said purpose.
T'would be an infinitely better retirement legacy than any mere gold watch could ever hope !

25 posted on 12/11/2014 3:33:55 PM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
So people have some idea of what it is Warren/Durbin are talking about:
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/12/09/wall-street-seeks-to-tuck-dodd-frank-changes-in-budget-bill/?_r=0

Here is a rundown of the main Dodd-Frank issues that may be in play over the next day or so. The list is based on information learned from people briefed on the legislative negotiations who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

¶ The bill that Citigroup helped draft: This bill would repeal one of the more contentious provisions in Dodd Frank, a requirement that banks “push out” some derivatives trading into separate units that are not backed by the government’s deposit insurance fund. The proponents of the push-out rule argued that it would isolate risky trading from parts of a bank eligible for a government bailout.

The provision exempted many derivatives from the push-out requirement, but some Republicans have long proposed eliminating the provision altogether.

In late 2011, Citigroup floated a compromise. The bank’s lobbyists sent around a proposal that simply exempted a wider array of derivatives from the push-out plan.

As The New York Times reported last year, lawmakers adopted nearly every word of Citigroup’s plan in drafting a bill. The bank’s recommendations are reflected in more than 70 of the 85 lines of that bill.

Remember Citi is in the pockets of liberals a la Rubin and Lew:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/01/09/us-citigroup-rubin-idUSN0930738020090109

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/11/jack-lew-rubin-citigroup_n_2458142.html

26 posted on 12/11/2014 3:33:59 PM PST by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
[Rush]
It's just, again, when it comes to amnesty, the Republicans want it. The Chamber of Commerce wants it, and we know that.

The Republican leadership/Chamber of Commerce henchcritters want both unlimited immigration (the Wall Street Journal once put that in an editorial, carved in letters four feet tall, just before 9/11, and I won't let them forget it) and Obamacare, and Boehner is working like hell to get it for them, and to make sure no GOP fingerprints are left behind on the deed.

Obamacare lets Chamber members (and I use that word in both senses, i.e. sensu non stricto) dump their employee health plans (not including the executive plans, of course) and throw people on the mercy of the 'Rat Party and its medical orc-ocrats. The old plans' premiums will be flowed through to the bottom line very bonusably, after a seemly-exclusive boardroom orgy, er, party), and the employees will be stiffed across the board. Big-shot CEO's used to come on Lou Rukeyser's show 10 years ago and fulminate and swear up and down that they were going to get rid of employee health care and they didn't care what happened to the employees -- and now they've made good on their blood vows and are partying like it's 1999.

The object of illimitable mass-immigration, since the mid-1800's, has been to crush wages -- which implies that people will be even less able to afford their own health care. But who cares? Screw them. Let them eat Obamacare forms.

27 posted on 12/11/2014 3:46:54 PM PST by lentulusgracchus ("If America was a house, the Left would root for the termites." - Greg Gutfeld)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Disambiguator
"Resist we mush! "

Add this to my long list of times I've wished FR had an edit function.

28 posted on 12/11/2014 4:44:52 PM PST by Baynative (Did you ever notice that atheists don't dare sue Muslims?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

The only reason Rinos are acting like losers is because their party lost control of the Senate and the House. Now they have to deal with those eeeevil conservatives of the GOP. It is much easier for GOP liberals to deal with their heart throbs, the Dems, than it is for them to deal with the real GOP.


29 posted on 12/11/2014 6:54:56 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
I don't necessarily hate Republicans.

I hate the Republican'ts.

"We can't challenge the president

"There is nothing we can do about it"

"We can't pass that law. It won't hold up in court."

"We can't pass that law. The president will veto it"

"Our hands are tied"

"The media will have a field day if we do that."

30 posted on 12/12/2014 6:11:09 AM PST by nitzy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nitzy

Did you see Steve Salmon and Louie Gomert on Hannity last night? Gomert basically accused Boehner of being a Democrat. He said that now nothing can really be done to stop Obama’s amnesty come January when the new House is sworn in. The GOP base has been had.


31 posted on 12/12/2014 6:29:34 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Shadow44

When you compromise with evil, EVIL WINS.


32 posted on 12/12/2014 7:21:15 AM PST by JayAr36 (Old enough to remember when this was a free country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass
Obama: I'm headed to the links and Michelle has her eye on some high fashion in Milan.

Bonehead: I hear Ya Brother, I'm headed back to my office for a fine bottle (or two) of some 12 year old scotch.

McTurtle: Chortle

33 posted on 12/12/2014 7:39:53 AM PST by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson