Posted on 12/15/2014 9:37:46 AM PST by Boomer
HARTFORD, Conn. – The families of nine of the 26 people killed and a teacher wounded two years ago at the Sandy Hook Elementary School filed a lawsuit Monday against the manufacturer, distributor and seller of the rifle used in the shooting.
The negligence and wrongful death lawsuit, filed in Bridgeport Superior Court, asserts that the Bushmaster AR-15 rifle should not have been made publicly available because it was designed for military use and is unsuited for hunting or home defense.
"The AR-15 was specifically engineered for the United States military to meet the needs of changing warfare," attorney Josh Koskoff said in a release. "In fact, one of the Army's specifications for the AR-15 was that it has the capability to penetrate a steel helmet."
In addition to Bushmaster, the defendants are Camfour, a firearm distributor, and Riverview Gun Sales, the East Windsor store where the gunman's mother purchased the Bushmaster rifle in 2010.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I hope you never sit on a jury with that statement.
I have seen no evidence that there was an ar15 rifle used in this crime. No surveillance photos, no crime scene photos, no shell casings, no bullet fragments, nothing. Now in a world where we could still trust government that might be ok but as soon as Eric Holder was dispatched to this crime scene any element of credibility of this investigation went right out the window.
I have stated that government and the justice dept in particular have been caught red handed, fabricating stories and orchestrating all out illegal activities to further an agenda of gun control. That's called motive.
Now on the other hand you believe a rifle was used even though you have virtually nothing to support that theory other than trust. Now that sounds illogical to me.
Is that all you got? retard troll attacking the messenger because you are too stupid to formulate an argument? At least I can have a condition and not be a total zero down the mental toilet.
Well, here is something that might shed more light on the firearm used, and I admit to trusting this author soooo....
Here we go again.
PING!
ping!
Witnesses reported seeing a rifle. casing were found in the building obviously. They are easy to figure out. If pistols were used, you would think at least someone who witnessed the crime would come forward and mention that fact.
Your premise is based on ALL the witnesses being part of the conspiracy which is ludicrous. Plus you are dealing with a small town police dept, not a secretive federal acronym. Keeping them quiet is almost impossible.
Frivolous lawsuit; prior suit was thrown out.
The known surviving adults that actually saw the shooter did not see the rifle. You can find interviews online. one of them only saw his legs.
Take a look at the following link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJkvB9goPAA
Do you think this report where they stated they heard from federal officials was wrong? I doubt it. I think it was the truth until the Holder led justice dept got involved, that's when the narrative changed to a Bushmaster. Research the interview with the coroner, see how uneasy he is when questioned about the weapon involved. It's very clear he is not comfortable with what he is saying.
NBC would not know what kind of weapon was used until the data was released.
“The known surviving adults that actually saw the shooter did not see the rifle. “
Do you have a link to a news story?
Sorry to hear that. Good luck with your therapy. A first first step might be to stay away from the Internet.
A lot of sick stuff there, like "Actors/FakeChildren!"
also, there’s a matter of proof regarding which weapon(s)
were used. ... the *expense* is the deterrent here
NBC was reporting that federal officials informed them that no rifle was used and only four handguns were found inside the school. Did you even listen to the report?
dude, seriously, playing tough boy over the internet? get a life, your own custody, that is. but you like to murder the messenger because you are too cowardly to discuss the message. Pathetic.
Thanks for the laughs. Don’t ever change!
Requiring that Guns be under Lock and Key would mean that Car Keys must be under lock and key along with Cutlery, blunt objects and anything that could cause harm to another individual.
As I have said to people who wail about Guns and Newton, would you feel better if the Perp ran the kids over driving his Mom’s Truck when they were walking to School or if he threw a couple of Molotov Cocktails into the Classroom and burned the Kids to death?
Never underestimate Human Ingenuity. Why, I’ll even bet somebody could make a Bomb just using Fireworks and Pressure Cookers. Oh wait, they already have...
So you believe the feds when they say they found pistols but you don’t believe them when they say they found an AR-15.
See the dilemma?
Bubye
Nope no delema at all. Those agents were just underlings doing their job so they told the truth. Then holder and the don’t let a crisis go to waste team got involved. That’s when things changed, and suddenly it was a bushmaster AR. It’s very obvious.
Why do you only trust them when they agree with you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.