Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kristinn

The senators never even went in and looked at the evidence to remove from office.

I wish all representatives were under severe restriction to vote along the lines of their constituents and to take up study of anything 30% of their constituents vote to look into.


10 posted on 12/18/2014 11:58:53 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Yaelle

That’s right. They didn’t want to see the evidence, which should have been made public in the senate chamber. It is another downside to the 17th Amendment; senators represent party interests, not state interests. Party loyalty trumps all. No rat senator will ever vote for impeachment of a rat prez. I forget which senator said he didn’t care if a witness found Bill Clinton standing over a dead body with smoking gun.


17 posted on 12/19/2014 1:31:26 AM PST by Jacquerie (Article V. If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Yaelle

Trent Lott said he didn’t see any evidence. And MS people agreed.


53 posted on 12/19/2014 8:58:17 AM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson