[daler]

So, let me get this straight: if there's a promising new treatment for cancer or Alzheimer's, the FDA needs 20 to 30 years to run trials to make sure it's safe.

But, the 100% likelihood that gay blood donors will kill innocent people...hey, what's the problem?

[HiTech RedNeck]

Or else it sounds like they believe they have far better tests. That is a factor that I hardly ever hear discussed directly. Ever since “gay” has been on the scene of blood donation this has been a danger... how did we ever know that they would self identify? Buggery does not automatically stamp a scarlet B on someone’s forehead. What has guarded against antisocial, hostile liars (cf. Typhoid Marys)? Nothing except better blood tests.

Yes, I understand the presence of a moral problem which is worse than the medical problem. This is part of the marching attempt to normalize buggery.