Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What’s a “Fair Share” for Upper-Income Taxpayers?
Townhall.com ^ | January 3, 2015 | Daniel J. Mitchell

Posted on 01/03/2015 9:05:46 AM PST by Kaslin

Barack Obama and the rest of the class-warfare crowd act as if “tax the rich” is an appropriate answer to every question about fiscal policy.

I’m not joking. Here are some of the President’s main tax hikes that have been enacted or proposed.

(Excerpt) Read more at finance.townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: null and void
Nahhh. 10%. We’re better that Russia, aren’t we, aren’t we???

No, 'fraid not. Obama is so bad, we're on the level of Zimbabwe right now.

61 posted on 01/03/2015 4:01:25 PM PST by wastedyears (I may be stupid, but at least I'm not Darwin Awards stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cheesemaster

The corollary is that all these greedy corporations are apparently being taken left and right by employees who always seem to bargain for more value than they provide, if most of their wage is “gain” as the government claims.


62 posted on 01/03/2015 6:12:38 PM PST by cheesemaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Personally, I would like to see the end of the “charitable” foundation.


63 posted on 01/03/2015 6:52:17 PM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by government regulation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Works for me!


64 posted on 01/03/2015 6:54:23 PM PST by Taxman (I'M MAD AS HELL AND I'M NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

probably not. The FAIR tax resembles the present income tax enough where they don’t need it. A FAIR tax is still a progressive income tax where those who earn little get a handout and those who earn more pay a higher percentage.

The only real difference is the retarded “prebate”


65 posted on 01/03/2015 8:01:09 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant

I’ve never seen that as a significant problem, TedGrant. It seems to me that it should be possible to craft a mechanism by which to recognize those after-tax savings, and to credit/remove the FairTax on transactions using those funds. Alternatively, it may be that a refund process would be effective, although I would tend away from that as it may require more bureaucrats.
In any case, the FairTax still is deserving of further discussion and debate.

Thanks for the post.


66 posted on 01/03/2015 8:52:25 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Not one cent more than the bottom taxpayer.


67 posted on 01/03/2015 8:58:04 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
What’s a “Fair Share” for Upper-Income Taxpayers?

Same as everyone else: One man, one vote, one share.

1/300,000,000th of the budget.

68 posted on 01/03/2015 9:03:35 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Taxman
the USA would probably prosper very nicely on an overall (local, county, state and federal) 10% to 20% retail sales (consumption) tax.

What determines the tax rate? Would it be a flat rate based on what's being purchased, such as a bicycle vs. a car?

69 posted on 01/03/2015 9:51:42 PM PST by wastedyears (I may be stupid, but at least I'm not Darwin Awards stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Would a Fair Tax also require an amendment?

Does it take a new amendment to abolish an old one? Last I remember, the Fair Tax bill has abolishing the income tax written into it, so I don't know if an amendment would be required.

70 posted on 01/03/2015 9:55:43 PM PST by wastedyears (I may be stupid, but at least I'm not Darwin Awards stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I would be thrilled to see the Fair Tax. It would be far better than the monstrosity that we have today.


71 posted on 01/04/2015 3:06:21 AM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Taxman; All

THERE TOO MANY PIGS AT THE TROUGH!

How does one shrink the number of pigs feeding at the trough?

There is the problem, my fellow FReepers!

Well-stated, Taxman!

How?

DEPOPULATE ‘Rats/progressives/socialists/criminals/deceivers/RINOS/totalitarians/scumbags/pigs/etc., etc. from the body politic and your life.

DEFUND/DISMANTLE their collectives/agencies, foreign and domestic.

It’s easy to…

…live free republic (in a constitutionally limited one)

C’mon 2016


72 posted on 01/04/2015 7:09:55 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Other than needing a constitutional amendment are there any other reasons to object to the 50 State Tax? A constitutional amendment is a big wall to climb and would gladly accept the Fair Tax a means to walk around that wall.

A 50 State Tax would cost the taxpayers almost nothing to collect and completely eliminates the entire IRS collection apparatus. That savings could be returned to the taxpayers in the form of lower taxes.

Those states with rational tax collecting policies would thrive. Those that don’t wouldn’t.


73 posted on 01/04/2015 7:29:04 AM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

The Fair Tax would abolish the income tax but not the IRS. An huge agency would still be needed to collect the sales tax. But...Believe me. I would welcome the Fair Tax as a enormous
improvement.
A huge amount of political energy will be needed to reform the federal system of tax collection. I would hope that this energy would be directed into a system that would accomplish the following:
1) cost the fewest pennies per dollar collected.
2) eliminates the IRS completely.
3) There is no chance for it to morph into another progressive income tax with thousands of pages of exemptions and tax favors. (Returning tax money to the poorest would result in a IRS and increase the number of pennies it costs to collect one dollar of tax. )


74 posted on 01/04/2015 7:43:25 AM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There should be no income tax as our founding fathers knew and did not place into the US Constitution. It is robbery.


75 posted on 01/04/2015 8:33:26 AM PST by CodeToad (Islam should be outlawed and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

I’m thinking even the most arch conservative sees a return to the self supporting government you describe as the goal but not the path to the goal.


76 posted on 01/05/2015 7:47:49 PM PST by cashless (Obama told us he would side with Muslims if the political winds shifted in an ugly direction. Ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson