Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Legislators Are Spending Fast And Loose With Your Contributions
Hardhatters ^ | 01/08/2014 | Hardhatter's Team

Posted on 01/08/2015 1:43:01 PM PST by thetallguy24

Being in the Texas Legislature is not intended to be a lucrative career. Legislators receive part-time pay. They are only in session six months every two years. It is, for all intents and purposes, a volunteer position for those wishing to serve the public.

Last week, we released an exhaustive report covering the loans relating to the campaigns and PACs of every Texas Legislator. Despite a tepid and defensive response from the Texas Ethics Commission (TEC) regarding our figures and call for an audit, we delved further into the campaign finances of the Legislature. This time we took a closer look at how Texas Legislators are spending your contributions. Through our research it appears that many of them aren’t particularly careful in observing the rules set out by the TEC (although the TEC isn’t really paying attention), and some expenditures, while most likely legal, aren’t very ethical.

One of the main rules guiding Texas politicians is the prohibition of using political contributions for personal use. Personal use is very subjective to the TEC, as politicians are permitted to profit through interest on their own loans and often travel to luxurious destinations as long as it is for campaign reasons. An area strictly forbidden is renting or purchasing property from close relatives, themselves, or a business they may own (at least 10% ownership). We examined Legislators’ payments to themselves and known/suspected family members. Many Legislators have been paying rent for properties that appear to violate this rule.


(Excerpt) Read more at hardhatters.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: corruption; gop; teaparty; texas; tx
"Tom Craddick paid his daughter and now Texas Railroad Commissioner Christi Craddick $1,019,009.89 (that is not a typo) from 2003-2011. The last payment ($7,215.92) occurring just two months before she announced her candidacy. Despite paying her on average $113,223.11 per year, Rep. Craddick dismissed this because she was not a “dependent”."

Holy crap. How can you pay your daughter over $1 million and say she's not a dependent? These two should be in jail. I guess Craddick got away with a ton of things as speaker though.

1 posted on 01/08/2015 1:43:01 PM PST by thetallguy24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

I would say a million bucks would make you pretty independent.


2 posted on 01/08/2015 1:49:07 PM PST by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

Carddick has always been a crook. Democrats started running as Republicans to get elected. They depend on lazy straight ticket voters.


3 posted on 01/08/2015 2:10:49 PM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

Actually, the legislative session in TX is less than five months every other year.


4 posted on 01/08/2015 2:27:44 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Haven’t we had special sessions every freaking year its held?


5 posted on 01/08/2015 2:31:30 PM PST by thetallguy24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

If I give 50 bucks of my hard earned money to promote my beliefs and they stuff it off to their family members or otherwise blow it on pet projects, that’s practically criminal, if not actually so, but that’s besides the point.

The problem here is that the guys actually elected (this report apparently isn’t looking at failed candidates) are getting big money from big special interests. Those donors don’t care if elected officials use a million bucks to support their daughters, etc.

But we should care, because it amounts to little more than bribery.

If THIS isn’t why the TEC exists, to stop this sort of behavior, then why have a TEC at all? (I do know the answer, the TEC serves as a barrier to running; having to comply with onerous regs keeps the playing field smaller for the previous winners, and they write the laws.)


6 posted on 01/08/2015 3:00:47 PM PST by ziravan (Choose Sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

No, there have not been that many special session; three for redistricting in 2003 and two or three for education funding in 2006.


7 posted on 01/08/2015 4:43:14 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Try again

http://www.lrl.state.tx.us/sessions/SpecialSessions/specialsessionYears.cfm


8 posted on 01/08/2015 5:35:47 PM PST by thetallguy24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

4 of the last 5 legislatures have had special sessions, but that’s just a quibble. The legislature in Texas meets ~about a half year out of every two, five to seven or so months depending on special sessions.

As a side note, HB2, the pro-life bill in the last legislature had to be passed in special session because the Texas House Speaker, Joe Straus, isn’t pro-life. His wife sat on the board of planned parenthood and he routinely stifles pro-life legislation.

The Gov calls special sessions and sets the agenda. Give Perry this prop: he called the special session that created HB2. (There were three special sessions last time, one to deal with the pro-life and transportation issue - this was the special session where Dewhurst allowed Wendy Davis to filibuster and run out the clock, a second session for the pro-life bill to pass, and a third to raid the rainy day fund for transportation).


9 posted on 01/08/2015 9:54:36 PM PST by ziravan (Choose Sides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ziravan

Actually, HB2 had to be passed in the special session because the Senate Republicans stripped the bill of the partial birth abortion ban. When it got to the House, the House added the ban back, so it had to be sent back to the Senate, which allowed for the filibuster. You can thank Glenn Hegar for that.


10 posted on 01/09/2015 6:36:39 AM PST by thetallguy24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

Sorry, I forgot the popular Wendy Davis session was a special session, or was it? I know a special session followed her.


11 posted on 01/14/2015 8:10:45 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson