Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Army officer to remain in prison for slaying of 2 Afghan nationals
The Fayetteville Observer, via Stars & Stripes ^ | January 6, 2015 | Paul Woolverton

Posted on 01/11/2015 9:58:56 AM PST by Timber Rattler

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Timber Rattler

“Get the lawyers off the battlefield.” Col. Ralph Peters


21 posted on 01/11/2015 10:46:47 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

He [the poster} did ask. The sincerity of his inquiry is open to question. Their [his mates] responses probably had as much weigh on the decision the authorities made as our votes made in the 2014 midterms. To wit: none.


22 posted on 01/11/2015 10:50:40 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sport

The military needs a medal for cannon fodder. Awarded to soldiers sacrificed to further the agenda if their CIC and direct supervisor/superiors.

A big brass one with an engraving of a man shot into a brick wall via Howitzer. And it should be presented by the officers in question in front of a TV camera and a collection of the Fodder’s family and friends.


23 posted on 01/11/2015 10:54:51 AM PST by Norm Lenhart (Landru/Romney 2016: "Are you Of the Body, Brother?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Unicorns and Skittles, It's The American Way!!!


24 posted on 01/11/2015 10:55:43 AM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

We are the people we have been waiting for afterall. It could be no other way.


25 posted on 01/11/2015 10:57:16 AM PST by Norm Lenhart (Landru/Romney 2016: "Are you Of the Body, Brother?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
And how many soldiers deaths is Bergdahl responsible for?

Thank you for bringing this up.

26 posted on 01/11/2015 11:24:40 AM PST by JohnG45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cowboy Bob

Of course he’s at fault. He misunderstood the enemy and didn’t give them hugs.


27 posted on 01/11/2015 11:37:23 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Anyone that would look at startrek is lower than a 2 year old idiot as far as i’m concerned.

As far as the crap behined someone’s name, i’ve never even looked at it and don’t know who puts it there.


28 posted on 01/11/2015 12:25:52 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

Your literary and viewing opinions are about on par with Ebert. Not being able to differentiate blatantly obvious sarcasm and then trying to brass your way through it as if I offended your mother is rather like the two year old you mentioned as well. It’s really not an existential level crisis here. It was a joke. Laugh or don’t.

Either way, not my problem. It’s yours.


29 posted on 01/11/2015 12:32:23 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (Landru/Romney 2016: "Are you Of the Body, Brother?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

You remember what Ralph Peters recently said about getting the lawyers off the battlefield? I give you Exhibit A.


30 posted on 01/11/2015 12:35:50 PM PST by TADSLOS (The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler; All

http://allenbwest.com/2015/01/must-disgust-clint-lorance-denied-clemency-disgraced-sexual-deviant-general-cuts-plea-deal/


31 posted on 01/11/2015 1:55:13 PM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not A Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
This action by Clarke is evidence of reasonable doubt regarding guilt.

In re Winship (1970), the doctrine of reasonable doubt applies to all the essential facts necessary to prove a crime.

I need to check, but I think the Winship decision reads ...

"(We) explicitly hold that the due process Clause protects the accused against conviction except upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime with which he is charged."

Amen to that.

32 posted on 01/16/2015 12:21:54 PM PST by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson