[MortMan]

Meaning that the first amendment is still in force in Texas?

Or that Texans should riot and break/burn/whatever something or someone because the muslims want to spout a bunch of nonsense?

I’m confused as to what you mean... The differences cited for Texas involve the reaction to crimes. This conference is insane, but not criminal. Provided that the words expressed do not take the form of threats, of course.

I disagree vehemently with their message, but I cannot find any constitutional reason why they can be prevented from expressing that message.

[MaxMax]

For starters our Government needs to recognize Islam as a form of Government, which it is.
Then acts of subversion against our Country would need to be prosecuted and those
committing the Treason need to be tried and executed. And All other Muslims thrown
out of the country.

Islam is a blatant theocracy and those who are ignoring it as that, are enablers
and willful combatants against the Constitution and rule of law.

Islam is no different than the Kings men of the 1700's coming over, then claiming
King George III as a prophet. It's a legal spin to justify invasion but our Constitution
isn't a Suicide pact and it can be stopped.

Unless thousands of Texans show up to protest this "Peacefully" those who do
may be arrested and you can bet your house that DHS and Holders men will be there to
demand the arrest of all who show up to defy the evil intent of this insurrection!

How the local officers react to Holders demands is unknown. I would expect
99.999% of them to side with America.

[itsahoot]

I disagree vehemently with their message, but I cannot find any constitutional reason why they can be prevented from expressing that message.

Maybe you can use the "Shouting Fire in a theater" excuse that the supremes use.

[CodeToad]

I can, Sedition. Mooselimbs call for sharia as the law of the land and they advocate for violation of civil rights.