[Norm Lenhart]

No, you tried weasling your way out of it just as you are now. You can’t correct truth with more lie. That site and it’s management are on record as being affiliated with LaRaza. Your assertions at the time that the SD fence failed were/are a farce on their face.

Your post came from a LaRaza Linked site. It was pure propaganda based on complete bullshit that a 2 year old could see through, much less anyone paying attention. You are indeed anti fence.

If the truth bothers you, try not acting like a liberal. Then you’ll be on the conservative side of the debate instead of the Rick Perry side of the debate.

[South40]

I don't know why you waste your time debating the pro-ILLEGAL alien crowd. That fight has been fought and won long ago. This particular poster may argue "No Border Wall" has no affiliation with La Raza but he/she cannot deny he/she shares the sentiments of the organization as does his/her liberal hero La Raza Rick Perry.

Does one really need be a member of an anti-American group to be a supporter?

[stephenjohnbanker]

The SD fence works as close to perfection as any govt. project EVER has. Anyone who denies this is either ignorant, or an outright liar!

BT, it appears that you qualify for the latter.

[BuckeyeTexan]

That site and it’s management are on record as being affiliated with LaRaza.

The No Border Wall organization was founded by McAllen, Texas resident Scott Nicol along with various other South Texas landowners whose properties are affected by the construction of border fencing. They are not formally associated with La Raza. No Border Wall is totally opposed to border fencing. I am not. I support fencing where it makes sense strategically and economically.

Your post came from a LaRaza Linked site. It was pure propaganda based on complete bullshit(...)

No, the data was not propaganda. The data was cited directly from the U.S. Border Patrol, the Department of Homeland Security, the Congressional Research Service, and the Bush Administration.

Here's my original post.

Then you’ll be on the conservative side of the debate instead of the Rick Perry side of the debate.

I am on the most conservative side of the debate. I reject the idea of wasting tens of billions more dollars of taxpayer money on ineffective fencing for the sake of a political symbol at the expense of common sense, property rights, and agricultural, environmental, and economic considerations and support the idea of strategic fencing, large numbers of boots on the ground, and effective use of surveillance and technology. I want a secure border not an insecure barrier that merely slows down the disease-ridden bloodsuckers and terrorists.

Your use of Alinsky Rules 5 & 12 is telling. You ignore the data so you can focus on the target. Keep up the good work, comrade.