[BRK]

Instead of “no-go zones,” I propose “semi-autonomous sectors,” a term that emphasizes their indistinct and non-geographic nature – thus permitting a more accurate discussion of what is, arguably, West Europe’s most acute problem.

That's a stupid name. If you look back in history, the first name assigned to anything usually turns out to be the most accurate. I guess this is because most names are initially assigned by people who see the obvious, and don't confuse themselves with convoluted thinking processes like political correctness, critical race theory and many other upside down-backward ass ideas. For example, I saw a guy on O'Reilly who has convinced himself that fighting against the Taliban victimizes them, and this victimization then justifies their atrocities.

It seems no-go zone is the most obvious term to use, then that's what we should stick to.

[logos]

How about “politically correct areas of civil regression”?

[bboop]

The first name is most accurate, I agree BRK. AND it is the one that will stick. It’s easy to say, it means what it says, it is not PC, and the French Mayor cannot stop us from saying in, here on this side of the Pond. Plus, English is OUR language, so she is way out of her league here.