Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Says Treating Drug Use As a Criminal Problem Is "Counterproductive"
Huffington Post ^ | jan 22, 2015 | Tony Newman

Posted on 01/28/2015 10:52:45 AM PST by balch3

President Barack Obama continues to speak out against mass incarceration, the devastating impact of our drug policies on communities of color and his expectation that marijuana legalization will continue to spread.

Obama's comments came today during his YouTube interviews with YouTube bloggers, Bethany Mota, GloZell Green and Hank Green.

Some Obama nuggets from today's interview include this on marijuana:

"What you're seeing now is Colorado, Washington through state referenda, they're experimenting with legal marijuana," the president said in response to a question from host Hank Green.

"The position of my administration has been that we still have federal laws that classify marijuana as an illegal substance, but we're not going to spend a lot of resources trying to turn back decisions that have been made at the state level on this issue. My suspicion is that you're gonna see other states start looking at this."

Obama also addressed how we should treat people who are not violent drug offenders.

"What I am doing at the federal level," Obama responded, "is asking my Department of Justice just to examine generally how we are treating nonviolent drug offenders, because I think you're right."

"What we have done is instead of focusing on treatment -- the same way we focused, say, with tobacco or drunk driving or other problems where we treat it as public health problem -- we've treated this exclusively as a criminal problem," the president said. "I think that it's been counterproductive, and it's been devastating in a lot of minority communities. It presents the possibility at least of unequal application of the law, and that has to be changed."

(Excerpt) Read more at huffingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: counterproductive; criminal; drugs; libertarianagenda; libertarians; medicalmarijuana; obama; obamaagenda; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-225 next last
To: jsanders2001
All that legalization will do is just change the distribution channel.

Yes, from criminals to law-abiding businesspeople.

The price might actually go up

Government has managed not to tax into existence any significant black market in alcohol - nor, except for a few liberal east coast cities, in tobacco.

Besides if it’s legal and everybody has it there will be even more break-ins by the self-entitled freeloaders...

Why would they be doing more breaking in then than they do now? Sounds like it requires more effort and focus that someone who's high would want to exert.

81 posted on 01/28/2015 12:23:27 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
There “ bankruptcy” is obvious to anyone.

Wow, that was feeble.

82 posted on 01/28/2015 12:25:46 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom
You can't stop lying about me; I neither love nor boost drugs ... any more than I love or boost alcohol, tobacco, or Marxist literature by supporting their legality for adults.

You certainly support alcohol and tobacco as well as Marxist principles, if not their literature.

You are constantly boosting drugs.

83 posted on 01/28/2015 12:26:19 PM PST by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Before I catch flak as well...I’d like to point out, there is a HUGE difference in legalization, decriminalization, and or restructuring penal codes.

Legalization is absolutely not the answer. Legalize drugs and people get really really stupid...look at the debacle in CO. for example.


84 posted on 01/28/2015 12:26:24 PM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

Pants are not Policy. Idiot.


85 posted on 01/28/2015 12:26:48 PM PST by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
If the law declares something wrong, it dissuades a significant portion of the people from doing it.

Have any evidence for this claim? Seems to me that many legal things are rarely done.

86 posted on 01/28/2015 12:26:59 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: balch3

Hay, Them poor blacks must spend their welfare, and food stamp money on something. They sure in hell wont spend the money on getting ready for work!!!


87 posted on 01/28/2015 12:27:25 PM PST by EXCH54FE (Hurricane 416,Feisty Old Vet !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777
look at the debacle in CO. for example.

What "debacle"?

88 posted on 01/28/2015 12:27:36 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
You can't stop lying about me; I neither love nor boost drugs ... any more than I love or boost alcohol, tobacco, or Marxist literature by supporting their legality for adults.

You certainly support alcohol and tobacco

Only according to your personal definition.

89 posted on 01/28/2015 12:28:34 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: balch3

Yes, treating crimes like they are criminal is bad.


90 posted on 01/28/2015 12:30:15 PM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
The Singapore solution would be even more effective than the soft solution suggested in my post #62. But we lack the will to adopt it.

Someone earlier had asserted that the "War on Drugs" was a "cure worse than the disease." I immediately corrected this misinformed notion. It isn't a "cure" it is a "treatment." (and No, the disease is far worse than the "treatment.") America has no stomach for a "cure" as you so aptly point out.

91 posted on 01/28/2015 12:31:21 PM PST by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Pants are not Policy.

Do you support or oppose Obama's policy of terminating the Justice Department’s "Equitable Sharing" civil asset forfeiture program?

92 posted on 01/28/2015 12:32:35 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Yeah, so?

Colorado is the beneficiary of a mass exodus from California. Those people are bringing their money and their businesses to Colorado, along with a lot of the ideas that wrecked California. They are now soiling their new nest.

93 posted on 01/28/2015 12:35:30 PM PST by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

“Seriously speaking, the drugs that need government involvement are heroin and other opiates, methamphetamine, pharmaceutical abuse, alcohol abuse, and some other drugs of lower priority, like cocaine, synthetics, etc.

Perhaps the majority of heroin abuse began with pharmaceutical abuse, and it needs to be addressed medically, not just exchanging methadone addiction for heroin addiction. It is likely that a private organization could set up a one-week program to clean up junkies, followed by outpatient therapy. Mostly drugs that block heroins action in the body.”

As a recovered alcoholic, I say that the physical aspects of addiction are relatively simple, compared to the more challenging psychological aspects.

If somebody claims to have a simple solution, chances are good they really do not.


94 posted on 01/28/2015 12:36:06 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001
"that" -> than
95 posted on 01/28/2015 12:36:23 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777
...look at the debacle in CO. for example.

Yeah, the state is just falling apart. From Business Insider, Aug 2014 =>

_________________________________________________________________

Here’s How All 50 State Economies Are Doing, Ranked From Slowest To Fastest

-snip-

All in all, Colorado’s economy is broadly growing at a healthy clip, and so it comes in as the overall winner.

http://www.businessinsider.com/state-economic-growth-rankings-2014-8

96 posted on 01/28/2015 12:36:35 PM PST by Ken H (What happens on the internet, stays on the internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: MrB

I like the addition.


97 posted on 01/28/2015 12:39:12 PM PST by MortMan (All those in favor of gun control raise both hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Absolutely - Alcohol intoxication (to impairment) while operating machinery or a motor vehicle would definitely remain illegal.


98 posted on 01/28/2015 12:40:47 PM PST by MortMan (All those in favor of gun control raise both hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom
I'm not interested in reading your rehashed and edited (for deliberate confusion) line of crap. Post civil war, addiction was *NOT* declining, it was going up.

The Civil war left the nation with 400,000 opium and cocaine addicts which jump started narcotic addiction in this country. The incorporation of opiates and cocainoids in popular patent medicines and beverages spurred even further addiction. This is *WHY* they passed the pure food and drug act in 1906. It was because they were noticing a lot of people getting stuck on dope.

99 posted on 01/28/2015 12:43:00 PM PST by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
I'm not interested in reading your rehashed and edited (for deliberate confusion) line of crap. Post civil war, addiction was *NOT* declining, it was going up.

I have evidence, you have claims. I'm not interested in whether that interests you - just pointing it out for sane, honest readers.

100 posted on 01/28/2015 12:46:31 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 221-225 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson