Posted on 01/28/2015 6:16:06 PM PST by Reverend Saltine
IN order to internalize the grave danger America is in relative to the injection of Shariah Law - one must first recognize why ANY semblance of Shariah Law implanted within America is a clear and present danger. Civil, criminal, Shariah financing laws makes no diff.
SPECIFICALLY, the Muslim Brotherhoods overall plan is to subsume all of America under the boot of Shariah, not just the Muslim community. They are deadly serious, and their track record attests as much. Dont dare to dismiss their American (and global) designs.
AT its base, Shariah Law is a knock out blow (despite protestations to the contrary, ala Islamists and anti-American leftists) to the U.S. Constitution, the law of the land.
Sharia is an Arabic word meaning path or way. Today the term is used most commonly to mean Islamic law, the detailed system of religious law developed by Muslim scholars in the first three centuries of Islam and still in force among fundamentalists today.
Wha?
Go ahead.
I have no idea what he is complaining about!
There is not always enough ROOM to post bthe full thing. I get it and why woood I NOT want to comply?
Ustedes Habla Espanol o Norte Americana?
I’m Hebrew
maybe a wide leather collar; this is the orgigin of “leather neck.” Look it up.
Have you by any chance been “tippling” tonight?
Yes, of course, but not a lot. I’m too old to be pushed around. I love this site and am doing my best to comply. I’ll take instruction but not his BS occuklt crap from smug, self-righteous Lawgivers. Send me teachers!
So
Sorry, but this is much ado about not very much.
In the Texas case, some Muslims lawyers have established a tribunal where devout Muslims can take their disputes to be settled. The rulings have no standing legally, and either litigant can just ignore them is he so chooses.
IOW, it’s similar to canon law in Catholicism, religious courts in many churches, and rabbinic courts in Judaism.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/mar/29/brooklyn-da-orthodox-jews-cover-up
For that matter, any two people in a dispute anywhere can agree to have a third person rule on the dispute using whatever rules or “laws” they mutually agree on.
Doesn’t make it “law” in any real sense.
OH?
LET THEM take the _____ back to wherever they and it came from
I’m fine with that. Though it should be noted Orthodox rabbinic law has a good bit in common with sharia, especially in divorce cases.
Why do you object if A and B ask C to settle a dispute between them, using whatever “laws” or rules they see fit? How does that injure you?
If and when somebody tries to impose sharia on non-Muslims or make shari rulings legally binding even on Muslims, I’ll get as excited as anybody. Till then, no big deal.
Listen to Me: if they like that, they cn go where that is done, or go the ____ back where they came from. It’s simple. Don’t give me thius conflict Resolutiion Montesori 101. I’m from a vanished age of real world smack my face reality
I’m a fan of incoherent posts. Thanks, this is a keeper.
You’re just missing the shorthand
Perry no longer has a state. For the last nine days, the Governor of TX is Greg Abbott.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Abbott
ROTFLMAO
See, he'd sort of a tipplin' way
With love for the liquor poor Tim was born
To help him on with his work each day
He'd a drop of the craythur every morn'"
Great.
Now I want to see my friend, Me Lucky Charm, from the Old Country and have a dram.
Think I’ll go grab one.
Leftist orthodoxy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.