Replies

I doubt she was wrong. There's an asterisk after the number and at the end the asterisk says "Figure does not meet standards of reliability or precision"

Your hysteria is really amazing. Even if 2 people died from measles more people than that are killed crossing the road.

There's nothing quite like watching the MSM stampede sheep.

I doubt she was wrong. There's an asterisk after the number and at the end the asterisk says "Figure does not meet standards of reliability or precision"

There is no asterisk preceding the cause-of-death code on the measles line item. There were also deaths from measles in 2010.

If you care one whit about standards, you'd have never cited anything from the VAERS system or suggest that it provides accurate and reliable information rather than the propaganda it does. So much for your adherence to cold facts.

Contrary to what your agenda driven graphic said, people died from measles during some of those years, and their claim that 108 had died from the vaccine itself is total BS.

The MSM may be hyped up about this but so is the woman you readily quote at the CDC. So which is it? Is the CDC a reliable organization? They must be if you quote them to make your point. So when the CDC panics over the outbreaks, are they also being stampeded by the MSM?

Why would a parent not vaccinate their kids and subject them to the possibility of contracting a communicable disease needlessly? Do they like watching their kids suffer and flirt with death?

Even in terms of disease, 1 or 2 deaths is miniscule. Thousands die from just the flu and/or MRSAs each year. So for a disease, this is small. Having infections in the hundreds also proves by proportion that the vaccine actually works for those who have it, because that means that less than 1 percent of the population is getting infected with measles, or 99 percent aren’t.