Scott Walker once employed liberal feminazi Liz Mair

http://www.mofopolitics.com/2015/02/01/scott-walker-once-employed-liberal-feminazi-liz-mair/ ^

[JRandomFreeper]

Bull crap.

I am responsible only for who I vote FOR.

You can take your moral equivalence and shove it where the sun don't shine. That crap isn't going to fly this election.

/johnny

[E. Pluribus Unum]

If you help Hillary win it’s on you, whether you like it or not.

[fieldmarshaldj]

Nope. I don’t vote for left-wingers. McCain was the final straw in ‘08 (and I’d take back that vote if I could, he only got it because of Palin and my hope he’d keel over from the stress of the job). I voted for Conservative Virgil Goode in 2012. If the GOP nominates another left-wing ringer (El Jebbe, Willard, Stay-Puft Christie, et al), it will not get my vote again.

[RedMDer]

FReepers! Let's go!
Every donation counts!



[fatnotlazy]

I vote for the candidate who can do the job and who reflects my moral values. If you want to continue to vote for the incompetent loser anointed by the Republican liberal hierarchy, go ahead. But I don’t want to hear you or any other sheep like you whining and moaning because (a) your candidate lost or (b) he wins but turns out to be another big government, sodomite-hugging degenerate.

[fatman6502002]

I think he hired her firm to do consultant work regarding Medicare expansion vis-a-vis Obamacare. Apparently she recommended against Medicare expansion. And yes she is pro-gay marriage due to her Libertarian views. She is Libertarian with regard to her political philosophy. No matter how much some people are going to try to taint Scott Walker in some way, he is a solid Conservative with not an ounce of surrender in him. Some Conservatives will not like him because he chooses his battles wisely and does not fight all the battles all the time, and that is why he has been successful in starting to turn Wisconsin around because he has won the battles he’s fought.

[arthurus]

Bush is the Gope Nominee, whatever else happens. And his people in co-operation with the Democrats will be, nay IS, busily spreading sewage on all the conservatives and goading them to smear each other. If one, be it Cruz or Walker, or Palin or another can stay above the fray- can really understand and use the Reagan Handbook for Getting Elected- and can be humorous and keep a good humor about him, that will be the one who might just walk ơn by the Gope machine.

[JRandomFreeper]

No matter how loud or often you scream it, you aren't going to change votes with your phoney moral equivalence.

I was disgusted with it last election and I'm disgusted with it now.

/johnny

[E. Pluribus Unum]

President Hillary. Start getting used to it. It’s obviously what you want.

[fatman6502002]

Just curious because I worked on Walker’s first Governor campaign and his recall during my time working in Marinette, and I would like to know what exactly he has not been honest about? Personally, I think he is one of the most honest politicians I’ve ever seen.

[dfwgator]

Hillary or Jeb, what’s the difference?

[JRandomFreeper]

Nope. If you nominate a squish lib republican, President Hillary is on YOU.

/johnny

[fatman6502002]

This is why we lose. We’re 19 months from the election, a full year from the beginning of the primaries and you’ve already surrendered and given up at the first sign of adversity, which is clearly agitprop and you fall for it. Amazing.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

I don’t nominate anybody, but it’s obvious that you think you can so please nominate Cruz. I am for Cruz. I was never for Milt Romley or Juan McQueeg or Bob Dull, but that was the choice.

[arthurus]

I am continually exasperated by Hannity. He is simply not bright. He is DENSE and sophomoric. He misses the point when discussing anything with an articulate liberal who can use adjectives and adverbs. One can tell he thinks he really showed that guy but that guy always comes out looking like Hannity didn't understand what was said and missed the point. Liberal jabs that should be easily refuted have Hannity poking the air a foot from the liberal's head. Levin and Rush are far and away the best. Levin bugs me, though, when he trades cheap shots with Michael Wiener.

[fatman6502002]

What if Cruz does not win the nomination? Then who will you vote for in the general. Or will you sit home and help the democrats win again? Just curious.

[fatman6502002]

Of course, a purist who will take their ball and go home if their candidate does not win the nomination and help the dems get a third Obama term. The brilliance of the purist crybaby voter is never ending.

[JRandomFreeper]

FALSE. There were more choices than Dem and Republican, but you guys insist on telling that lie.

You obviously nominate, since I'm single-handedly responsible for President Hillary.

Your false moral equivalence will be attacked this election season. Get used to it.

/johnny

[fatman6502002]

If you would use your brain rather than your emotions to think about the abortion issue you might realize that it doesn’t matter what a candidate for president stands on the issue because he can do nothing about it. The issue is in the courts and the states. It matters what a governors stance is but not a President’s because he can do nothing about it. And again another purist will make excellent the enemy of perfect over one single issue that a President can do nothing about. The brilliance of the purist mind is overwhelming. And just so you know I am 100% pro-life, I do not even think that there should be an exemption for incest or rape. So don’t bother trying to label me as pro-choice or some other nonsense.

[JaguarXKE]

Thank you.