The federal constitution trumps the state constitution and the federal judges - wrong as they may be - have decided that the federal constitution mandates gay marriage. So Roy Moore’s view on the State Constitution aren’t really relevant.
If the Constitution always mandates whatever federal judges claim it mandated, there is judicial tyranny over the people.
Ruth Bader Ginsberg for instance was caught on tape making things up as she went along. Mark Levin played it and analyzed. Her comments were totally unrelated to the Constitution, about gay marriage which will be before the Court and already is, in a way, and she made it clear she’s all for it and believes it will become an easy sell to the people once they must allow it.
She has no clue what all the fuss is about, because that’s her personal view. And she was in a forum in which she spoke as a Justice on the Bench.
So there you have it. Whatever they say, for whatever reason, if that is accepted as law no matter what, then you have TYRANNY.
If that’s your America, it isn’t mine, nor is it the America that was originally founded.