Isn't that what she did by refusing to treat their kid?
Indirectly by implication perhaps if unseen by her, and she would be right in doing so, but besides there being no actual treatment (just a check up), nor examination that was denied by her - only that it was transferred to another doctor - due to her correct judgment that homosexual relations are immoral, her judgment was more that of her inability to provide the best care, which she arranged for. In so doing, she is protecting herself from violating her conscience, yet paradoxically in her love for the family she is also doing what she feels is best for them. It is indeed a hard choice for one with a strong conscience.
If you read the letter linked letter at the source (parts of which the MSM leaves out) then you can see her expressed motive was what was best for them and their child.
"After much prayer following your prenatal, I felt that I would not be able to develop the personal patient-doctor relationship that I normally do with my patients. I felt that was not fair to the two of you or to Bay. I felt that you deserved that type of relationship and I knew you could could get that with Dr. Karam.
We do not keep prenatal information once we have out meeting so i had no way to contact you. I found out the Monday morning that you were coming and I made the decision that it would be better for Dr. Karam to see Bay. I felt that it was an exciting time for the two of you and and I felt that if I came in and shared my decision then it would take away much of the excitement .
That was my mistake. I should have spoken to you directly that day. You were always welcome in our office and I assumed that you would continue care at our office with Dr. Karam.
Please know that I believe God gives us free choice and I would never judge anyone based on what they do with that free choice.
Again, I am very sorry for the hurt and angry feelings that were created by this. I hope you can accept my apology. I wish you all the best.
Blessings, Dr. Veina Roi.
Thus we have a doctor who wants the best for the Biblically perverse family, and is gracious to them at their meeting, but upon prayerful consideration feels she cannot develop the relationship with them (the tendency of homosexual activists to insist everyone affirm their iniquity would not help), but cannot contact them, but after they contact her office she therefore arranges another doc to care for them.
But which liberals portray as if the child was neglected treatment and demand the doctor respect and support a perverse union and family. But in so doing they utterly reject the doctors beliefs and preferences, as they want to compel all to salute the flag of Sodom, so to speak.
Therefore at that time, when all the people heard the sound of the cornet, flute, harp, sackbut, psaltery, and all kinds of musick, all the people, the nations, and the languages, fell down and worshipped the golden image that Nebuchadnezzar the king had set up. (Daniel 3:7)
Love for the family? Come on. I'm not suggesting that her actions placed the health and welfare of the kid at risk, and I don't suggest that it isn't her right to decide who to have as her patients and who not. But let's not suggest that her motivation was anything but disgust for them and their lifestyle.