Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/23/2015 12:47:01 PM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: cotton1706

Obama would be thrilled to get 98% of what he wants.


2 posted on 02/23/2015 12:48:40 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (True followers of Christ emulate Christ. True followers of Mohammed emulate Mohammed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

But isn’t he a Federal judge? So he’s not making decisions for Texas, but for the country.


3 posted on 02/23/2015 12:48:59 PM PST by Durbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

I thought there were 23 states in addition to Texas there were part of the original suit. How can a federal judge rule for one state and not the rest?


4 posted on 02/23/2015 12:51:51 PM PST by ConservativeInPA (#JuSuisCharlesMartel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706
OH SO obozo’s DOJ, selectively enforce the laws they like and ignore those they don't agree with and America's decline continues under these current DC criminals in all three branches.
5 posted on 02/23/2015 12:53:54 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

That’s a perfect compromise solution...as long as Texas can secede as part of the deal.


6 posted on 02/23/2015 12:54:38 PM PST by peyton randolph (Good intentions do not excuse poor results.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

weren’t there about 26 states in that lawsuit?


7 posted on 02/23/2015 12:55:58 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706
Obama Admin Proposes Compromise to Judge: Let Every State Except Texas Implement Exec Amnesty

IOW the other 56 should do his bidding?

8 posted on 02/23/2015 12:56:03 PM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

Retreating compromise. They know they’ve got a losing case.


9 posted on 02/23/2015 12:57:31 PM PST by OKSooner ("Remember Fort Hood, Boston, and Moore, Oklahoma.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

Will Texas be exempt from Federal demands for funding these programs as part of the deal?


10 posted on 02/23/2015 12:57:43 PM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706; Hostage; Publius; xzins

What kind of joke is this?


11 posted on 02/23/2015 12:57:49 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

Enforcing the law would cause the Department of Homeland Security “irreparable harm”? Hahahahahha!

They should be sanctioned for a frivolous appeal.


14 posted on 02/23/2015 1:02:05 PM PST by Ray76 (Obama says, "Unlike my mum, Ruth has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

I believe the injunction was requested by 26 states.


16 posted on 02/23/2015 1:05:19 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

If the judge does this, then the Dictator will issue a new memorandum which deems all illegals to be residents of states other than Texas.


17 posted on 02/23/2015 1:07:12 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

This is satire, right?


18 posted on 02/23/2015 1:09:27 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Saying that ISIL is not Islamic is like saying Obama is not an Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706
Ha....Bronkbama checkmated himself......

here he is in remedial 101 coin toss.....


19 posted on 02/23/2015 1:11:14 PM PST by spokeshave (He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

This is the biggest CROCK I could ever never imagine as a basis for a stay.

Of course Judge Hanen will refuse to enter a stay. They have to ask him as a formality otherwise the Appeals Court will kick it back downstairs.


20 posted on 02/23/2015 1:11:56 PM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706

...like changing the tires whilst going down the road...but this is nothing new...


21 posted on 02/23/2015 1:12:45 PM PST by choctaw man (Good ole Andrew Jackson, or You're the Reason God Made Oklahoma...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706; xzins
The Obama administration alleged that a “stay pending appeal is necessary to ensure that the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS” or “Department”) is able to most effectively protect national security, public safety, and the integrity of the border.”

The attorney who wrote that should be disbarred. You can't lie to the court in a brief. That is such a bald faced lie that it does not even deserve a response, other than referring the attorney to the state bar for purposes of discipline.

22 posted on 02/23/2015 1:13:32 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Saying that ISIL is not Islamic is like saying Obama is not an Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


26 posted on 02/23/2015 1:17:45 PM PST by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cotton1706
If I recall, the Judge essentially conceded that the administration has authority to enforce (or not enforce) deportations. But he declared the issuance of work permits was an overreach of the law.

I can't imagine how the administration can claim with a hint of honesty that the inability to issue work permits to illegals is inhibiting DHS, or putting the nation at risk.

They can't just say this stuff in a brief, they have to show some evidence, don't they?

29 posted on 02/23/2015 1:22:16 PM PST by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson