Regime to Justice Roberts: Catastrophe If You Rule Against Obamacare

Townhall.com ^ | March 4, 2015 | Rush Limbaugh

[mad_as_he$$]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2543298/posts

[rodguy911]

Nothing "possible" about it if you do the research.

There is a very good case to be made that Robert's wife told him in no uncertain terms that she wanted to adopt two blond haired children,a boy and a girl, from her home country of cork, Ireland which is very hard if not impossible to do.

So they got creative.

Roberts through surrogates got the birth mothers to smuggle the kids into Central America and he adopted the kids from there.

Trouble is years ago the NYT researched the story found out what was going on and "almost" blew the whistle. IN the end since they figured out that there might be consequences if they told the entire truth they stopped covering the end of the story due to "the children's civil rights" which is BS for they had no guts to tell the whole story.

Anyway the kids were brought into the US and the regime found out and blackmailed the crap out of Roberts.It's why zerocare is a tax.

[Irish Eyes]

Thanks for the answer, for the Robert’s sake I hope this gets settled once and for all.

[chris37]

My pleasure.

Frankly, if the court does anything other than throw this law out, it no longer deserves to exist.

These people have entirely too much power based upon their interpretation of what they want and nothing else.

It is not a court as far as I am concerned.

[bgill]

Make that, Justice Roberts, if you don't rule the way your blackmailer wants, then you're gonna be wiping people's your family's health care out. Sounds very clear what they mean and that he's still worried about whatever it is they have on him. If it's the adoption, it's already been outted as rumor. On the other hand, it might be he's afraid of them taking him to court on it. Or they have something more damaging on him.

[Hardens Hollow]

The facts are the Roberts’ adopted 2 children from Ireland, a country that does not allow adoption of its children by noncitizens. It was done by having the mothers go to a South American country with their infants and the adoption took place there.

The assumption is that that was an illegal way to adopt these children.

Don’t blast me for this - I’m just relaying the information. I personally think it’s more likely that Roberts was looking at ‘his’ court’s legacy and thought it needed to appear bipartisan or nonpartisan, actually.

[Graybeard58]

The way it was posted by the original poster, that the Roberts were more than 40 years old when they adopted two children, without further explanation, led me to believe that their ages were the objection.

It was explained in full, further into the thread.

[qaz123]

I was listening to talk radio all day: Cain, Limbaugh, Hannity, Erickson. Didn’t catch every minute of each show, but didn’t hear it once from any of them.

More than anything, I’m curious to know if any of that was brought up in the arguments before SCOTUS.

[Ray76]

Reality check for Roberts:

Pelosi's webpage:

MYTH: Mandating health insurance coverage is a new tax.

FACT: Not true.

http://web.archive.org/web/20101008091759/http://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/factcheck?id=0114

---

MYTH: Mandating health insurance coverage is like a new tax.

FACT: As President Obama pointed out yesterday: “[F]or us to say that you've got to take a responsibility to get health insurance is absolutely not a tax increase…

http://web.archive.org/web/20101008091920/http://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/factcheck?id=0109

If Roberts wheels out another far-fetched lie and tells us "exchange established by the state" really means "exchange established by the HHS Secretary", then rule of law has been destroyed.

[Ray76]

Do we need to remind Roberts about compulsion to contract?

[Ray76]

Pelosi webpage with discussion of Gruber analysis and link to same
http://web.archive.org/web/20100304070108/speaker.gov/newsroom/factcheck?id=0142

Nov 4, 2009 - According to a new analysis by MIT Professor and CBO health advisor Dr. Jonathan Gruber...
http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?q=news/mit-analysis-confirms-that-hr-3962-will-deliver-substantial-savings

Pelosi cites Gruber, he is an adviser to the CBO, he has testified before numerous committees, he has participated in Oval Office meetings discussing health insurance, yet Dems try to downplay Gruber. Why would that be? Could it be: "If you’re a state and you don’t set up an exchange, that means your citizens don’t get their tax credits" - Gruber
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34rttqLh12U

[SteveH]

If John Roberts is involved in human trafficking then Ireland and Interpol should step in and arrest him and his wife, and they both should be convicted and sentenced to hard time in an Irish jail, and so if it is true then I wonder why is this not happening? Especially if it is true that they visit Ireland every 2 years. IOW is Ireland in on the Roberts blackmail?