I'm sorry, but I do not consider an analysis that contains this statement unquestionable. Maybe if it was altered to something like "unfettered American government" I'd believe it. Bush did nothing to reduce the scope and spending IMO. Even worse, he created two of the biggest threats to our liberty not seen in generations: DHS and TSA.
That hitching point aside, there is some merit in the argument Democrats may feel that she is the only one in the way of Republican control of government - including a SC justice pick or two. Granted.
But there are those kooks out there (many it seems by the hype about her) who think Warren is the understudy who will stun Broadway after Hillary breaks her legs (hard to do with calves like that) and can't star in the play. Regardless, if it isn't Warren it will be some other Obama-like Turtle that has been drudged up and concocted.
Here is what Obama is going to do to make sure the sales for that play (no matter who stars) are SRO. He WILL allow 10 Million illegals to register to vote. He will fight lawsuits and connive federal injunctions to allow the process to continue through to the election. Those are the numbers Democrats need to win, and he will give them the votes.
To win a presidential election, Democrats don't need 10 million illegal aliens to vote. They simply need them living in the U.S. and counted in the U.S. census. Electoral votes and Congressional seats are apportioned by population, not registered voters. This is why California has 53 seats in the House and 55 electoral votes, even though it probably has some Congressional districts where most of the residents can't vote.