Did you read the post you are replying to?
Here's what you said, copy/pasted from your post #74:
They should simply require the fraternity brothers to visit the Sooner Football locker room and spend some quality time with members of the Defensive and Offensive Lines, a Running Back or two and a few Sooner Defensive Backs.
There would likely be an attitude adjustment.
Now, please explain to me, exactly HOW you thought the football team members would accomplish the "attitude adjustment" you desired? With their superlative debate skills?
Keep in mind that this is a written forum, not a verbal debate. Your statements WILL follow you around, and you will not be able to say "I didn't say that", when a simple copy/paste and link will show that you DID.
You and ilovesarah2012 are on record as saying (you in #74, and her in #1) as being in favor of responding to offensive statements with violence, or threat of violence.
Will you confirm that viewpoint, or will you repudiate it? If someone is offended by a verbal statement, do you sanction the offended person responding violently? It's a simple question.
Verbal statement = threat of violence.
Hanging in a tree is a threat, not a “verbal statement”. If you want to defend that kind of talk, fine. I will not.
Alvarez-Guard
Dalton-Center
Daimler-Tackle
Darlington-Center
Dimon-DE
Now, please be specific as to where I mentioned race, violence or even implied that black football players should hurt or otherwise be violent against the frat brothers who expressed their desire to hang blacks from trees.