Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I don't think this is over by any means. Am I paranoid?
1 posted on 03/10/2015 12:51:50 PM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fruser1
Anyone with the slightest familiarity with the Clintons knows very well that they fully intended to destroy culpable evidence.

That is the sole reason the hardware was within their reach. Premeditated intent to destroy evidence of wrong doing.

2 posted on 03/10/2015 12:54:09 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Since the server is no longer in use, what is she using for personal/private email now?

Lying witch.


6 posted on 03/10/2015 1:03:44 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1
As a Secretary of State, if you wanted to hand off something classified, what better way to do it than in person through the old diplomatic pouch? I mostly discount any "spy" angle here.

There's no other intent using unsecure e-mail than attempted treason with careless disregard.

7 posted on 03/10/2015 1:04:00 PM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

COMPLETELY rigged so called “press” “conference”.

VERY SHORT, to limit questions.

Pre-scripted answers she read off paper.

Selected reporters from group.

Television cameras shunted from seeing her reading cheat notes.

Television cameras shunted from seeing reporters.

All fake, PR stunt.


8 posted on 03/10/2015 1:04:23 PM PDT by Varsity Flight (Extortion-Care is is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Paging Mr. Snowden. Mr. Snowden? Those emails are out there somewhere.


10 posted on 03/10/2015 1:06:06 PM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

On Morning Joe today Howard Dean said he thinks it was a good idea for Hillary to keep her state Dept work related emails secret from the government, cant make this stuff up


12 posted on 03/10/2015 1:07:14 PM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

n my previous life when I was designing Information Systems, it was standard corporate policy to record and archive all incoming emails regardless or origination. Seems this is also the policy of the State Department IT “professionals”. I wonder why no one has mentioned those archived emails? Hmmmmm......


13 posted on 03/10/2015 1:11:55 PM PDT by Ben Mugged (The number one enemy of liberalism is reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1
Who else besides Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton has ever had an email address at clintonemail.com? Did "Hummer" Abedin have an address on that domain? Who else ever had an address at that domain? Carrying two phones might have been beneath Mrs. Clinton, but I'll bet her flunkies had two or three at all times. Put them all under oath.
15 posted on 03/10/2015 1:14:36 PM PDT by Always A Marine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

“Quite frankly, I’m not concerned about Hillary’s email to other .gov addresses. I’m sure they’re benign.”

Huh??

“I’m also sure she knows when something is classified.”

She’ smart?

“As a Secretary of State, if you wanted to hand off something classified, what better way to do it than in person through the old diplomatic pouch? “

She’s smart? actually did any real work?

Had others do the work she’s not capable of?


23 posted on 03/10/2015 1:26:49 PM PDT by Varsity Flight (Extortion-Care is is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1
Its worse than we thought

the server was in BILLS office...for several years....




25 posted on 03/10/2015 1:33:44 PM PDT by MeshugeMikey ("Never, Never, Never, Give Up," Winston Churchill ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

This is clearly a well thought out plan to circumvent the law.

Hillary’s server system was put into place in anticipation of exactly the kind of cover up she engaged in after the Benghazi terrorist murders.

So now we have a cover-up of the cover-up.

The Clintons and Obama make Dick Nixon look like a Boy Scout.


26 posted on 03/10/2015 1:35:16 PM PDT by Iron Munro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1
The Republicans need to beat her at her own game. It's time to "dump" some very incriminating Hilary e-mails in the press, on the internet, all through social media.

Who cares whether they are real or not? Why not make them up? They could be real. You know, "fake but accurate."

The point is that without the server itself being made available in an "unscrubbed" condition, how does she effectively deny the existence of any alleged e-mail that comes to light?

27 posted on 03/10/2015 1:37:15 PM PDT by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Part of the “why” is that the people she emailed with using the private address willfully broke the law as well, if they were doing government business.


30 posted on 03/10/2015 1:44:03 PM PDT by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

It doesn’t matter if Hillary committed 20 felonies a day, on video, in public, with 2,000 witnesses.

She is of the protected class and will never be held accountable in any way for anything. EVER. Short of murder she can commit just about any crime she wants with total impunity (and even then she might get away with murder when she declares her prosecution a ‘war on women’).

In the world of Progressives there is no such thing as actual criminal activity. All crime is either inadvertent or the result of oppression from some outside group so it can always be rationalized and ignored.


36 posted on 03/10/2015 2:12:06 PM PDT by navyguy (The National Reset Button is pushed with the trigger finger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

“As a Secretary of State, if you wanted to hand off something classified, what better way to do it than in person through the old diplomatic pouch?”

As SoS, if you wanted to hand off something classified to someone you’re not supposed to be having connections to at all (say, gunrunners in Libya planning to attack the US Embassy there), what better way to do it than store relevant emails on a “secure but hackable” private off-site server? No physical trace/contact, erasable logs.


37 posted on 03/10/2015 2:13:23 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1
 photo 9dfad742-108d-4243-87e0-e585610bbe40_zpsl7b5v3uf.jpg
38 posted on 03/10/2015 2:13:25 PM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fruser1

Nah, no problem here. Everyone knows private email accounts are secure and no foreign or domestic players could exploit national security information.

/s

Hillary Clinton and her apologists give new meaning to the words, “incredible idiot”.

Once again Hillary knows more than any other person alive, when it comes to what should and shouldn’t be done as a (department head) Secretary to the President of the United States.

Anyone else would have already lost their job and be facing charges for what Hillary did.


41 posted on 03/10/2015 2:21:03 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson