Why is he not in prison? Seriously.
So far, mostly by crook
Put me down for “by crook”.
Nope.
Uncle Joe Stalin’s playbook, page by page, line by line.
If he does leave the white house in ‘17, he will have left a path of destruction reminiscent of the Joplin tornado.
If a ‘Republican’ somehow manages to get into office, it’ll probably take them literally four years to undo this madness regarding the Executive Orders.
This is just a nightmare. Don’t know how else to describe it. I can’t even begin to say what I feel, because I would be put in a cage.
God help us all....
... And he ain’t got no hook....
[or by crook,]
Don’t crooks usually belong in jail?
Likely, he has no intention to leave if the 2016 election results don’t please him. In the interim, he will seize all the power he can and move himself into a position to reject any election result as he has rejected the 2014 repudiation of his leadership. “Not enough people voted for this to be a valid result.”
I can't stand this. The President is just the head of one of the three co-equal branches of government. Yet Obama talks as if he is King, and Congress is just a bunch of easily-ignored ignorant peasants.
Defund, Boehner, defund!
He’s not about to leave office voluntarily.
“...or we will convene the private sector.” (Obama)
*********************
An excerpt from an old thread with a 1937 booklet about FDR and the New Deal called “The Revolution Was”. Obama once again follows FDR’s playbook
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts
Excerpt:
PROBLEM FIVE WHAT TO DO WITH BUSINESS WHETHER TO LIQUIDATE OR SHACKLE IT
There was a Director of the Budget who was not at heart a New Dealer. One day he brought to the President the next annual budget the one of which the President afterward said: “The country, and I think most of Congress, did not fully realize the large sums which would be expended by the government this year and next, nor did they realize the great amount the Treasury would have to borrow.”
At the end of his work the Director of the Budget had written a paragraph saying simply and yet in a positive manner that .....the government had really no thought of going into competition with private enterprise.
Having lingered for some time over this paragraph the President said: “I’m not so sure we ought to say that.”
The Director of the Budget asked, “Why not, Mr. President?”
The President did not answer immediately, but one of his aides who had been listening said: “I’ll tell you why. Who knows that we shall not want to take over all business?”
The Director of the Budget looked at the President, and the President said: “Let’s leave it out.” And of course it was left out....
Business is in itself a power. In a free economic system it is an autonomous power, and generally hostile to any extension of government power. That is why a revolutionary party has to do something with it. In Russia it was liquidated; and although that is the short and simple way, it may not turn out so well because business is a delicate and wonderful mechanism; moreover, if it wi11 consent to go along it can be very helpful.
Always in business there will be a number, indeed, an astonishing number, who would sooner conform than resist, and besides these there will be always a few more who may be called the Quislings of capitalism. Neither Hitler nor Mussolini ever attempted to liquidate business. They only deprived it of its power and made it serve.”
By “crook” alright.
Time is going to catch up to you Barry, you can count on it.
I'm waiting for my summons.....
Words fail. WOW.
When little men spout big words, bad things happen to them.
Epic fail doubles down.
So let it be written so let it be done.