AND THESE CHEMICAL WEAPONS ( AKA WMD’s THAT DID NOT “Exist” as in “Bush lied” ) were used in this way:
The report found that insurgents had used some of the weapons in roadside bombs, that most of the episodes had never been publicly acknowledged and that many troops who had been wounded by the blister or nerve agents had received substandard medical care and had been denied military awards.
But there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The New York Times said so.
This is impossible because there were no Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq.
Bush lied.
Interesting that this article is in the NYT. They probably are probably one of the Lib newspapers that claimed that WMDs in Iraq was a Bush lie.
Wonder if they or their readers are smart enough to connect the dots.
Well, as long as the Army said they’re sorry, that’s good enough for me.
So the NYT’s is printing this because.....1)Sadam had WMD or 2)Bush was prez and it was his fault?
This is why we can’t trust liberals with foreign policy and security issues. The libs kept repeating the no WMDs in Iraq mantra for years. The weapons in Iraq aside, where the hell do they think Assad in Syria got his chemical weapons from? Stupid liberals.
An apology. How comforting. /s
Oh...so he’s “going to fix it going forward,” is he?
Well, what about those who are broken ALREADY as a result of it?
These veterans are owed...and all of the words in the world will not heal them or recompense them.
They need action. They need the treatment. They need the compensation. They need the care.
STOP spending our treasure on aliens. Stop spending it on negotiating and cow-towing with our enemies.
God help us turn these misbegotten anti-American traitorous bastards out!
“. . .old and abandoned . . .”
Uh, ok.
WMDs that don’t exist are hurting our troops. And it’s still Bush’s fault.
I’d have to wrap my head in duct tape to keep my skull from exploding if I had that many contradictory things in my brain.
It’s a scam - there are no chemical weapons in Iraq......