Posted on 03/30/2015 10:32:21 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
But the "it depends on the situation" category is larger in the case of promiscuity and 5% more of those surveyed find homosexual sex morally acceptable as opposed to promiscuous sex.
There is something bogus about the survey though. Are we really supposed to believe that more young people find sex between two people under 18 objectionable than either homosexual or promiscuous heterosexual sex? Maybe they didn't understand the question or something?
They’ve been brainwashed their entire lives. This is the result.
I am a board member of my church, and there is very little I don’t know about each parent, and their offspring.
I'm not saying millennials don't passively accept it, but that they don't particularly do it or care about it. What that means, as someone suggested here, is that their acceptance is skin-deep. They don't seem committed to it. As 0 memorably said on another subject, their vague responses on that issue, as opposed to detailed ones on the issues confronting real, male-and-female human sexuality, suggest that on homosexuality, they don't have "skin in the game." (Yuck.)
This isn't good. We should care about our fellow man. Unconstrained by God, things could turn ugly on a dime against homosexuals, beyond what any Christian would countenance.
Mathwise, that works out to about the same percentage of Amish living in the eastern half of the United States (by population).
Can you imagine the outcry if the Amish controlled our media, popular culture and key politicians and imposed their values on the rest of us? Not that they would, because such intolerance is contrary to the core of their religion. But for the homomafia, it is central. I doubt that Sodom became Sodom immediately either.
This has been their goal all along.. I have a daughter that has “married” lesbian friends..she calls them wife and wife
That makes my skin crawl.
Have you seen these videos where people go out on college campuses and ask the kids simple questions like "who won the Civil War?" and suchlike. Usually, they haven't a clue. But they score almost 100% when the questions have to do with the antics of some scumbag celebrity on a reality show.
Going to people like that to help determine what public policy should be would be like going to a nuthouse to get opinions about logic.
By the time college rolled around, my "indoctrination" was so solidly in place,there was nothing that could break through it; not even lowered grades.
You and I aren't alone.....I know of others who have raised their kids the same way we have; thankfully !
The brainwashing through media onslaught was a complete success.
I read an article back in the late 1990s where "activists" laid out what they were going to do, and bragged about it.
I still remember that article.
“....rabidly intense propaganda effort by the entertainment and educational media for the past twenty years....”
They did some survey asking people what percentage of people were gay. Most people said 30%-40%! (My teen daughter said 30% when I asked her).
Previous studies say it ranges from 2% to 10% (high number is from pro-day Kinsly). The recent survey showing San Fransico is 6.7% seems to support the 2% number.
My kids are pretty much Libertarian when it comes to sex, although as teens they think their peers put too much on it (too much drama), and that it is stupid if you aren’t married.
My son looks like the typical liberal guy at college. But he is conflicted over whether to quit our church now that the main organization has allowed gay marriage. Our church is still conservative. We’ll see.
Uhhhh, no. Ancestry & the Mormon Church both do genealogy, but one's for pay, the other is for religion.
I believe that the Mormons are down on poofting.
Raising kids these days is very difficult.
Yes it is. I have four and the oldest is 17 with a girlfriend and I just pray that he uses his brain and beliefs we taught him and his siblings. Remember how screwed up Reagan’s kids turned out even though he was the most conservative person on Earth at the time and most likely constantly discussed morals with the kids.....we could be the best parents on Earth and still the kids could end up totally a disaster.
True enough. All one can do is try, but try very hard.
Only the children Reagan had with Nancy turned out badly; his biological first daughter and adopted son turned out great!
Sign of a dying civilization.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.