The New Yorker really nailed this cover, despite its satirical intentions.
There's only one thing wrong: Michelle has never been that svelte.
Posted on 04/06/2015 12:32:49 PM PDT by kingattax
Nearly all the discussion and debate about the controversial deal involving Iran’s weapons program has focused on the potential for the radical regime to someday obtain nuclear weapons. However, there’s another, more immediate threat posed by the likely easing or ending of sanctions against Iran, says the Israeli prime minister.
Benjamin Netanyahu identified that clear and present danger during an appearance Sunday on ABC’s “This Week.” That threat, said the Israeli leader, is the re-fueled “terror machine” that has been wreaking havoc throughout the Middle East and continues to cause chaos as it supports various terrorist organizations.
If and when sanctions are lifted, Netanyahu pointed out, Iran will have billions more dollars that can be used right away to destabilize and destroy governments across the region, even as the Iranian nuclear program continues to be developed.
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournalism.com ...
I think several freepers have mentioned this “feature” of the great leaders “agreement” with the mullahs
Obama is just fine with all of this.
A traitor as President and a traitor as Secretary of state. What could *possibly* go wrong?
Don’t forget Dear Leader’s personal advisor... born in Shiraz, Iran, and learned politics in the Chicago fraud machine... as did Hillary and Obama.
Well we can certainly regard Kerry as a traitor, but then he's been one since Vietnam. Obama on the other hand is more difficult to assess, because we don't actually know what nation he is a citizen of. In any case, it isn't this one.
Obama Doctrine , Lie, Cheat and Delay until it’s Too Late
The iranian islamonazis expanding their military and terror attacks all over is exactly what obama wants. That’s why he sent them billions of dollars before his farce of a press release letting them keep building their icbm’s and nuclear bombs. This is also why he threatened to go to war anybody who might try to get rid of the bomb and rocket factories. By the time they hit our American cities, O will be back in his native country laughing his head off about how stupid usa is
I swear if we could go back in time a day after Sept. 11th 2001 and tell people this stuff they would never believe it in a million years. “Hey people. See the nice Islamic terrorists who just destroyed the World trade center and the Pentagon killing 3000 people? In only 7 years Democraps will elect a guy named Barack Hussein Obama on a ticket named Obama-Biden! Doesn’t it sound just like Osama Bin-Laden? ha ha! How intentionally coincidental. His senior adviser will be Iranian born and he will do nothing else but empower and defend radical Islam even after they kill a US Ambassador and 3 Americans while he kicks the legs out from the US and Israel every chance he gets! And incredibly he will be elected to a 2nd term! And during his 2nd term he’s going to release all these terrorists from jail and trade 5 of them for a traitor while ignoring 2 Marines locked up in Mexico and Iran and then he’s going to select a traitor to the USA as Secretary of state who’s going to clear the way for Iran to get the nuclear bomb while making enemies with Israel! Isn’t that great?!”
If he isn't a traitor, he's an enemy agent/combatant out of uniform. Either way, he isn't rooting or working for the home team.
I think you nailed it!
You're right. We have a MUSLIM president who is running interference for his RADICAL MUSLIM brothers.
For one reason or another the average American finds that fact difficult to accept.
The New Yorker really nailed this cover, despite its satirical intentions.
There's only one thing wrong: Michelle has never been that svelte.
You’re right. I read this on FR weeks ago.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
The administration doesn't care about a refueled terror operation. It a good countervailing force vs the USA and Europe.
we cant expect the “media” to take note I guess!
Self loathing Feinstein apparently has no concern for humanity....
Feinstein: Netanyahu should ‘contain himself’ ^
04/05/2015 4:05:34 PM PDT · by Kevin in California · 29 replies
Patriot Update ^ | 04-05-2015
“I wish that he would contain himself, because he has put out no real alternative,” Feinstein said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) took direct aim at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday for his attempt to derail a long-awaited international nuclear deal with Iran.
Feinstein: Netanyahu Needs to ‘Contain Himself’ ^
04/05/2015 8:49:11 AM PDT · by E. Pluribus Unum · 45 replies
Breitbart ^ | 04/05/2015 | Pam Key
Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu needed to “contain himself” and stop criticizing President Barack Obama’s proposed nuclear deal with Iran.Feinstein said, “I don’t think it’s helpful for Israel to come out and oppose this one opportunity to change a major dynamic, which is downhill, a downhill dynamic in this part of the world.”
Sen. Feinstein: Wish Netanyahu ‘Would Contain Himself’ (Video at link) ^
04/05/2015 8:20:33 AM PDT · by Dave346 · 21 replies
Mediaite ^ | 9:51 am, April 5th, 2015 | Evan McMurry
Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) told CNN’s State of the Union Sunday morning that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was doing more harm than good by his insistent efforts to turn the American public and lawmakers against President Barack Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran, especially given his lack of alternative. “This can back backfire on him,” Feinstein said. “I wish that he would contain himself, because he has put out no real alternative. In his speech to the Congress — no real alternative. Since then — no real alternative.” Guest host Jim Acosta said Bibi’s alternative was tougher sanctions. “It depends...
Sen. Feinstein: Netanyahu’s Speech “Humiliating, Embarrassing And Very Arrogant” ^
03/08/2015 12:46:37 PM PDT · by Dave346 · 61 replies
RCP ^ | 3/8/15
SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN (D-CA): I think we have to do a nuclear agreement to protect from a breakout, and I think that, you know, what Prime Minister Netanyahu did here was something that no ally of the United States would have done. I find it humiliating, embarrassing and very arrogant because this agreement is not yet finished. To trash it before you have the final period on it, before you know what it is, I think is a huge error in judgment for our number one ally in that area.
Feinstein: Netanyahu ‘Doesn’t Speak for Me’ ^
03/01/2015 3:50:53 PM PST · by Eleutheria5 · 92 replies
Arutz Sheva ^ | 2/3/15 | Elad Benari
Senator Dianne Feinstein on Sunday launched a verbal attack against Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu over his upcoming speech to Congress. Speaking to CNN, the Democrat from California said that Netanyahu is “arrogant” for asserting that he speaks for all Jews, adding that he doesn’t speak for her. Feinstein said she would attend Netanyahu’s speech and would “listen respectively — respectfully. I don’t intend to jump up and down. And I hope he will speak about what happens if there isn’t an agreement.” “I happen to believe Israel is a lot safer with an agreement that’s agreed to by all...
Top Jewish Senator Feinstein: Netanyahu’s claim he represents all Jews is ‘arrogant’ ^
03/01/2015 10:34:23 AM PST · by Dave346 · 77 replies
Ynetnews ^ | 03.01.15, 19:12 | Itzhak Benhorin
US Senator Dianne Feinstein said Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s claim that he represents all Jews is “arrogant.” Feinstein, a senior Jewish senator was referencing comments by Netanyahu before he took off for the US, and said that he does not speak for her. “He doesn’t speak for me on this,” the California Democratic senator told CNN’s State of the Union Sunday. “I think it’s a rather arrogant statement. I think the Jewish community is like any other community. There are different points of view. I think that arrogance does not befit, Israel, candidly.” Prominent members of the US Jewish community...
Yep, we're not going to have to wait ten years for the horror to start... it'll start before the ink is dry on the 'agreement'... We've changed the power balance in the region - tipped it in favor of Iran. Iran will use that mistake... I'm guess 'war' within four years.
[[on the other hand is more difficult to assess, because we don’t actually know what nation he is a citizen of.]]
Nope, but we CAN determine with 100% accuracy which nations he loves and which ones He doesn’t
Wow. Sounds unbelievable when you string it all together like that, but every bit of it is TRUE!!! What a nightmare we have on our hands.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.