If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
CRUZ or LOSE!Posted on 04/10/2015 7:50:23 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)
Round one in the battle of anti-Establishment Republican presidential candidates goes to Sen. Ted Cruz.
In competition for the Tea Party's vote in 2016, the Texas Republican has bested Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky with a campaign rollout that GOP strategists say exceeded expectations and was almost flawlessly executed. Announcing for president two weeks later, Paul accomplished nearly the opposite, forcing a swift recalculation about which candidate is best positioned to win over the party's insurgent wing and vie for the nomination.
"Cruz had a superb rollout. He hit all the right notes," Republican guru Ed Rollins told the Washington Examiner on Thursday. "Paul had a disastrous rollout…He'll get back on track, but it was not a good first impression."
Heading into the primary, Republican insiders figured Paul was more likely to emerge as the choice of the party's anti-Establishment voters with the potential to grow beyond the base. Indeed, the latest public opinion polling shows him to be a strong candidate.
The first-term senator, 52, appeals to Tea Party Republicans and also enjoys support among libertarian activists who backed his father, former Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, in 2012. That group includes a significant bloc of younger voters. Paul was viewed as the more seasoned and innovative politician. He's operated as a principled conservative, but has prioritized reaching out to ethnic minorities and others who don't usually vote Republican.
Paul's early fundraising has been strong and in line with Cruz, 44; the Kentuckian raised more than $1 million online the first 36 hours of his campaign.
But his choice of a Louisville hotel ballroom for his launch was deemed surprisingly staid for a new wave Republican, and compared unfavorably to Cruz's launch before a packed arena of college students in Lynchburg, Va. Paul's testy, thin-skinned television interviews on day two prompted another round of criticism from Republican power brokers. The purposely-timed announcement that Cruz supporters have raised $31 million in super PAC money was yet another drag on Paul's launch.
"Cruz and his team showed they have a much better grasp on how to seize this moment and really break out of this eventual scrum on the right," said an unaffiliated Republican operative who advised a candidate in 2012.
The Paul campaign dismisses the criticism. His team said the campaign website garnered more than 1 million views in the first 24 hours, with most coming from 24-35-year-olds. The candidate's digital team, monitoring Facebook interactions and conversations about the senator, said he has been discussed in mostly positive terms among a broad cross section of voters since launching Tuesday. His Facebook page received more than 3.5 million unique views on Wednesday alone.
His campaign glossed the senator's clashes with reporters. "Rand Paul has proved that he is not going to let the liberal media walk all over him," campaign spokeswoman Eleanor May said in an email.
"Team Rand is very pleased with the announcement rollout," she added. "Sen. Rand Paul was welcomed into the presidential race by over 1,500 supporters in his home state of Kentucky. During his rollout, he shared the stage with an array of constituencies — local students, pastors, community leaders, veterans and doctors — and they all stood united in defense of liberty."
In trumping Paul's performance, Cruz also set the bar for other midrange Republican contenders hoping to vault into contention. As underdog candidates enter the race, they're likely to be judged against Cruz's fast jump out of the box and smartly played first few weeks on the trail. Paul's initial online fundraising totals will also be a measure for second and third-tier hopefuls.
There is no reason yet to believe that the launch of Cruz and Paul, two senators competing for roughly the same group of conservative primary voters, has upset the top shelf contenders, former Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida and Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin, and possibly Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, who will launch his White House bid on Monday. They have less riding on their rollout, having already demonstrated viability for the nomination — Bush via his fundraising prowess and political machine, Walker because of his broad appeal across the party, and Rubio through his fundraising and fluency in international affairs.
Bush and Walker in particular can probably afford to launch on their own timetable. They're polling at or near the top of the field in polls and have already established themselves as accomplished politicians capable of mounting national campaigns. For them, at least for now, the campaign is a marathon. The underdogs are essentially in a sprint, competing amongst themselves to be seen by voters as viable alternatives.
Although candidates at the top don't depend so much on their rollout, that doesn't mean they have nothing to lose. If they mess it up, they face damaging repercussions. Veterans of GOP presidential campaigns say its important for the top contenders to ignore insurgents like Cruz and to play to their strengths.
"I am a believer that there is no set form for these things," said Stuart Stevens, who advised GOP nominee Mitt Romney in 2012. "It's like a wedding. Big weddings are fine and small weddings are fine. As long as no one gets food poisoning and they actually get married, it's probably a success. The key is to do well what you set out to do."
CRUZ or LOSE!Rand will make a fine stalking horse for Cruz.
“The Paul campaign dismisses the criticism. His team said the campaign website garnered more than 1 million views in the first 24 hours, with most coming from 24-35-year-olds. The candidate’s digital team, monitoring Facebook interactions and conversations about the senator, said he has been discussed in mostly positive terms among a broad cross section of voters since launching Tuesday.”
Never fear! In places where Paul is being discussed in NOT so “mostly positive terms”, his digital team will deploy an army of 24-35-year-old Paulbots to attempt to sway poll numbers, clearing the way for The Maggot.
Cruz trumps everybody running, period.
I always get kicked for pointing it out, but... VPs don’t do anything. Except help get the President elected. Ted is close to Ron as they agree on mostly financial issues. We don’t have to admire Paul, but we need to view him as a vote-bringer.
This isn’t at all what was predicted for the last six months, is it?
KY always errs in its choices. Forget Rand
Yes, Cruz even trumps Trump!
Interesting conversation with a friend earlier in the week re Cruz: he’s an Austin conservative (read “fiscal conservative/social libertarian) who voted for Cruz and said he never will again, because “Cruz changed”. His proof: Cruz acted like an attorney and advocate when in the Solicitor General’s office, but is now acting like a politician, “playing to his base”.
My thought: so? He WAS a legal advocate in the SG’s office. He IS running for political office. Friend couldn’t point to any issue on which Cruz has changed his position.
Cruz or lose.
Got to be careful with that. Arguably, Reagan’s worst decision was Bush. It didn’t have to pan out the way it did, of course, but, in retrospect, it would have been far better if Reagan had picked someone who wasn’t averse to what Reagan stood for.
Having said that, I wouldn’t be overly concerned with Paul as VP, given that you are correct that their primary role is to act as a vote-getter. I would be quite troubled if Cruz picked an establishment Republican, as Reagan did. But, given Cruz’ clarity and intellectual honesty, I would expect him to pick someone who is closer to him ideologically.
Bush was forced on Reagan, so the gop-eSTAB would take over ‘if anything happened to the nice President’ like John Hinckley.
Tom Cotton seems like a good VP pick, but he can’t bring in millions of votes and ground-game like Rand and Ron can, on the trail with Cruz, who is adamantly 10th Amendment, and can remind voters they can have legal weed if they can get their statehouses to go along.
Cruz vs. Paul
Social conservative vs. libertarian
I’ll side with Ted.
LOL
Wow....not only do they know how many visited his website, they also know their ages.
For that reason the GOPe is going after Paul.
Cruz / Palin to trump the Hildebeast...
Some women will only vote for a woman regardless of qualifications..
They agree on pot.
You sure about that?
About 2 years ago I asked my son who is in his mid 40’s with almost 20 years Special Forces and 82nd Airborne who his segment of the world liked. He said that Paul had a lot of support among the military he knew. I don’t know whether it was Ron or Rand he was speaking of. I’ll have to ask him again.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.