Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
It was the North which refused to relinquish the fortification to the proper authorities. That encroachment was the first act of invasion.

I have read articles that assert Lincoln reneged on an agreement regarding the disposition of Union forts in Southern territory. That he had changed his mind and broke an existing agreement.

Even so, that doesn't give them a right to attack the Fort. It wasn't hurting them physically, and if they had just dealt with the hurt pride and embarrassment of it, they would have eventually seceded successfully and without a massive war.

One of the members of the Confederate cabinet begged them not to attack it. He told them that they currently have the support of the vast majority of Northern people, but if they attacked that fort all that benevolence would quickly turn to animosity and hatred.

And it did. The man was prophetic.

78 posted on 04/10/2015 7:09:56 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
The man was prophetic.

The man was Robert Toombs.

"The firing upon that fort will inaugurate a civil war greater than any the world has yet seen. Mr. President, at this time it is suicide, murder, and will lose us every friend at the North. You will wantonly strike a hornet's nest which extends from mountains to ocean, and legions now quiet will swarm out and sting us to death. It is unnecessary; it puts us in the wrong; it is fatal."

154 posted on 04/11/2015 5:53:56 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson