I can’t understand how continuing what the Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation etc. have been planning, and working toward since 1963 can work out well.
Are you sure you are not confusing the Convention of States with a Constitutional convention?
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/concon/newstates.htm#.VSqTo1GmePM
This is one source, when I research this I use a search engine, I found other sources with the same information
I have been following what the foundations are doing on this issue for over 15 years. I have researched the Convention of States informationn extensively the only difference I have found are based on the opinions of Rob Natelson, Mark Levin, Michael Faris, and others, no hard facts. I have read many responses to those who oppose the Convention of States on their website. They don’t respond with facts they respond with name calling, and ridicule, which indicates to me that there is very little difference if any between a Constitutional Convention, and a Convention of States.
Another thing that concerns me is with the propsed ammendmants, starting with the “Balanced Budget Ammendment”, The bills in state legislatures I have studied don’t address balancing the budget, they allow for Congress to raise the debt ceiling, and raise taxes. The only way to balance the budget is to restrict the amount that can be spent. The logical way would be to repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, which would stop the uncontrolde creation of money out of thin air.
The proposed balanced budget ammendment bills being run in state legislatures are worded very similarly to the ones from the foundations in the past.
If a convention is opened the foundations are well prepared, and extremely well funded to take control, when those people prepare for something they have many alternate plans to accomplish what they want.