Supported the kids would be one thing, but this $$$ goes directly to the mom for anything she wants to spend it on, as a payoff for getting knocked up.
DNA dad's have tried to tell the Stalinist family courts that the mother is spending the $$$ on other stuff, booze, lottery tickets, boyfriends, .... and the secret courts have told them its none of their business how she spends their paycheck.
If the courts forced her to spend it on the kids, and show proof, theny your premises would be true, but as it stans its completely false.
For example, many times these Marxist family courts have made men give the women this $$$ even after finding out that they are not even the father.
They have also awarded the whore the child support after the kids are over 21 and independent.
Its evil to bribe women to be single mom's like this.
Of course a man should only support a child that is his by birth ot legal adoption. However to eliminate all child support may sound good to you but what about the mothers who do care for their children using support. You sound as if you have had a bad deal but not all single mom’s are whores or waste support money. Maybe an accounting of how money is spent is a good idea. I have family who struggles to make ends meet while the ex drives a new car, has plenty of extras and won’t buy his kids a pair of shoes