There already exists a standard definition of “marriage” that withstands all the tests of time, tradition, and biology. If that definition is to be changed, something radically different has to have emerged about human nature to justify the change. Yet the homo community has demonstrated no compelling reason to redefine such a cornerstone institution except their own caprice.
I propose that they have failed to meet their burden of proof, and that that alone is justification for leaving the definition of marriage as it is, and as it has been for centuries.
It could be said that it will become a reductio ad absurdam with tragic consequences for families well beyond what they are now — and some lying cabal of professors will take an oath and deny it in open court.
The traditions of old Just Are Not Respected Any More.