[SunkenCiv]

Rand Paul: Time for GOP to soften war stance

...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... "We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party," Paul said.

[Posted on 01/31/2013 5:08:50 PM PST by xzins]

• Rand Paul's excuse for avoiding the 'religious freedom' law controversy doesn't add up
• Why Won't Rand Paul and Chris Christie Take a Position on Indiana's "Religious Freedom" Law?
• Heartache: It's over, Rand Paul lost
• Sam Youngman: A critical look at Rand Paul and 'winnability'
• Rand Paul's Big, Risky Bet on Youth
• Rand Paul: Christie Win Shows GOP Has Room for Moderates
• Rand Paul: Republicans Need to Soften on Social Issues

[trisham]

Did you mean to post to this thread?

[American Constitutionalist]

Rand Paul’s stance is compromise when it’s politically expedient, and let the left totally take over the Conservative part of the GOP, no thank you Rand..

But of course the lying, deceptive Rand Paul Paulbots here on FR will tell us that this statement from Rand Paul was him talking about leaving these social issues to the states, of course totally ignoring exactly what Rand Paul said in his statement here....