Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What If Abraham Lincoln Lived?
Accuracy in Academia ^ | April 23, 2015 | Spencer Irvine

Posted on 04/23/2015 8:10:28 AM PDT by Academiadotorg

Would the Civil Rights movement have taken place if Abraham Lincoln survived the assassin’s bullet by John Wilkes Booth? Allen Guelzo, a civil war era professor at Gettysburg College, posed this question in a recent lecture at Hillsdale’s Kirby Center.

Lincoln’s successor, Andrew Johnson, failed to bring the Union together after the end of the Civil War and “barely survived impeachment” from his own Republican Party. Guelzo wondered, “Could Lincoln have found…some practical system” to reconcile the South and North when the war ended. Lincoln had already tried at least one Reconstruction proposal in 1863, which was “bitterly criticized” by Congress for executive overreach.

Lincoln’s proposal was to “reconstruct the Union” while integrating universal suffrage (i.e. voting rights) for freed slaves. Congress proposed a different framework for the unified country, which Lincoln vetoed. As Guelzo noted, Lincoln saw “Reconstruction as a process of subduing the South and returning its states” to the Union and the control of the federal government. He had already begun the Reconstruction process in Southern territories seized by the Union army, such as in Tennessee and pockets in Louisiana. There, Union loyalists began “temporary military government” with state conventions, but the loyalist governments did not follow Lincoln’s instructions to push for universal suffrage. This, in Lincoln’s view, “would be as though the Union had never been disrupted.” Again, Congress “balked” at this move and went on to reject universal suffrage as well.

But, we may never know what Lincoln’s post-war plans were for the Union. In an 1865 address, Lincoln “had some new announcement” regarding the South, but had “nothing more specific to offer” at that time to avoid blowback like in his previous proposals. As one of Lincoln’s judges (who he later appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court) David Davis said, “[Lincoln] was the most reticent, secretive man I ever saw.” Guelzo felt that Lincoln aimed to give freed slaves, many of whom served in Union armies, a reward of “full civil liberties, voting rights, especially.” Also, it could have had large implications in politics, as it would have changed the existing three-fifths rule, where slaves were counted as three-fifths of a person. With universal suffrage, that requirement would be eliminated and could have led to a “long term Republican hegemony” in the South.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: abrahamlincoln; gettysburg; hillsdale
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Academiadotorg
Lincoln’s successor, Andrew Johnson, failed to bring the Union together after the end of the Civil War and “barely survived impeachment” from his own Republican Party.

Johnson was a Democrat who joined with Lincoln on a fusion ticket for the election of 1864.
21 posted on 04/23/2015 8:43:18 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

100 years from now, the armchair question will be, “Would the United States not have fallen apart if the country hadn’t allowed socialists to import 100 million illegal socialist voters...”


22 posted on 04/23/2015 8:49:56 AM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

True. He was not in favor of “Reconstruction” and would have healed the divide quicker. Johnson was a tool for the northern governors and Congressmen who wanted blood and secure the north’s industrial leverage for 100 years. Sort of like the other Johnson insuring democrap voters for 100 years.


23 posted on 04/23/2015 8:53:40 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hanamizu

I believe Lincoln sent a signal in his instructions to Grant to “...let ‘em up easy”, with regard to Lee’s surrender.

Though we’ll never know what that really meant.

I do believe however, that Lincoln would have come back to a fuller sense of the Constitution after having trashed so much of it during the War.

But again, that’s merely my belief.


24 posted on 04/23/2015 8:56:25 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: edwinland
Also, it could have had large implications in politics, as it would have changed the existing three-fifths rule, where slaves were counted as three-fifths of a person.

Once slavery was abolished, the three-fifths rule became moot. It would still be effective, but would apply to a nonexistent group of people. You could just as easily say that space aliens only count as three-fifths of a person.

25 posted on 04/23/2015 9:05:13 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative
Johnson was a tool for the northern governors and Congressmen who wanted blood and secure the north’s industrial leverage for 100 years.

Such a tool that they attempted to impeach him for being too easy on the south.

26 posted on 04/23/2015 9:19:09 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg; All

If Lincoln had lived:

Liberia’s population, today, would be 40 million larger.
America’s population, today, would be 40 million smaller.

Now, about the crime rate...


27 posted on 04/23/2015 9:22:54 AM PDT by ChicagahAl (Today's Democrats are much more Fascist than Communist; but Sen Joe McCarthy was still right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
I think Lincoln's legacy is a consequence of the fact that he died.

Lincoln won the Civil War; that's legacy enough for a president. His second term would have been noteworthy by fights with the Radical Republicans but I think Lincoln could still have gotten a lot accomplished.

28 posted on 04/23/2015 9:29:08 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: edwinland
But would they have constituted a majority in any Southern State or congressional district?

Yes, the state of South Carolina was majority black while Alabama and Mississippi were around 50% black. In addition, many congressional districts through the cotton belt were majority black then just as they are now.

29 posted on 04/23/2015 9:29:10 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

“Help me get out of this coffin!”

or

“Does anybody have any aspirin, I’ve got a killer headache.”


30 posted on 04/23/2015 9:41:54 AM PDT by Holdem Or Foldem (My sources are anonymous and tightly held. :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

If Lincoln had survived the shot to his head, he’d still have more brains than the POS in the White House today.


31 posted on 04/23/2015 9:44:34 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holdem Or Foldem

“How did the play end?”


32 posted on 04/23/2015 9:46:14 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Academiadotorg

PFL


33 posted on 04/23/2015 9:52:41 AM PDT by Batman11 (The orange, weeping, drunk, squishy oompah-loompah and Yertle McTurd-le gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

He would have become riviled and hated by the radicals who wanted to punish the south—He would not be the “great man” we see him as these days.


34 posted on 04/23/2015 10:20:23 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

No doubt martyrdom elevated his stature.


35 posted on 04/23/2015 10:31:50 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mass55th

Well played.


36 posted on 04/23/2015 10:48:50 AM PDT by CarolinaPeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

“No doubt martyrdom elevated his stature.”

Mediocre Presidents seeking a legacy should consider that option.


37 posted on 04/23/2015 10:48:51 AM PDT by TexasRepublic (Socialism is the gospel of envy and the religion of thieves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines

The point was to punish and keep the South less progressed than the North. That was the original intent of the 3/5ths person and the war. Most of the big investors in big southern plantations and slavery were Northern business.

Had Lincoln lived the recovery may have been better, sooner. It is often reported that Lincoln intended to ship the slaves back to their homeland, if that had been true it would definitely prevented a lot of discord, crime and poverty, even today. As it now is America may never pay off our pay-back.


38 posted on 04/23/2015 11:36:44 AM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt

I think the damage was done when the slaves were brought over from Africa to the Americas to begin with. That cannot be blamed on the U.S. IMHO. Slavery was started under colonial rule and was ended by the U.S. Some would argue that slavery should have ended right at the beginning of our nation’s finding. But we had to get through two wars with the greatest military power on earth, not to mention periodic conflicts with the Indians first.


39 posted on 04/23/2015 11:51:16 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: X-spurt
That was the original intent of the 3/5ths person and the war.

The net effect of the 3/5ths rule was to give the South a disproportionate level of representation in the House. How did that punish the South?

40 posted on 04/23/2015 11:53:34 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson