[Talisker]

I am not comparing it to combat. Your reading comprehension is bad. I was talking about the assumption that men and women in this generation do not have the sexual bias that your generation has. It’s not 1965 any more

The article is a comparison to combat, so not only is your reading comprehension bad, you comment is irrelevant. And not only do you know nothing about "my generation," you also seem to believe that 1965 was equal to 1865. So other than getting everything wrong, thanks for sharing.

[Vermont Lt]

There is nothing like an arrogant old man.

First of all, my comment was in reference to a comment made on the thread, not the article.

Keep up old man.

[Vermont Lt]

And while I am here, your world in 1965 was a lot closer to 1865 in the way you treated minorities and women.

We’ve come a long way. Be open to new things.