Politically Correct Intolerance = My Way Or Else
Truths about sodomites, like truths about blacks, are “hate facts”. Even when not knowing and acknowledging those truths can get others killed, through disease or violent crime.
I read this and completely agree with the author, but have to say I’m at a loss for how to go forward. Most of the people I know are appalled at the tyranny of liberalism, but none in our own capacity has the power to make much of a difference. The liberals are remarkably well organized, and we can’t even get the Republicans behind conservative values, even after we support them with our votes.
I think we need to pray for a God fearing leader who can unify this nation and turn us back to our founding principles.
The pervs have turned this into a war.
Let’s not disappoint them.
I’m gay and these ultra liberals piss me off.
Bump
Then you, as a lawyer, should recognized that homosexual "marriage" is not equal rights, but superior rights with regard to hetero-sexual marriage.
And I’d like to suggest to my fellow conservatives that that is the direction the wind is blowing.
non-sequitor. Simply because the "wind is blowing" in a certain direction, is does not follow that that is the best direction.
This is yet more proof that liberal calls for “fairness” and “tolerance”, along with calls for “inclusiveness” and “diversity” are all a guile-laden means to give liberals the means to simultaneously claim the moral high ground against conservatives as well as to advance the liberal agenda.
For example, in the wake of the 1969 Stonewall Inn riots in New York, in which gay men were brutally treated by police, it was often said that they just wanted to be “left alone”. [1]
It wasn’t long after this, that advocates for homosexual rights claimed that they just wanted to be able to “come out of the closet” and to participate in normal society.
Fast forward to the several incidents where owners of small businesses such as those that offer wedding services, cakes, meeting venues and photography serves have been hauled before government regulatory agencies and fined or even threatened with being thrown in jail for the crime of politely declining to be hired in support of an event relating to a same-sex “marriage”.
And then there is the case of the CEO of Mozilla, Brendan Eich, being fired because it was discovered that some years prior he had donated to a ballot initiative effort in California that defined marriage as being between one man and one woman.
By the reaction of supporters of homosexual rights today, it is clear that they are willing to issue death threats, slash tires, and to grind anyone into the ground where they can when it is found that they oppose this agenda.
So, it was never about just being left alone. The homosexual lobby now has the knickname of “gay mafia” or “gaystoppo” and the case of Brenden Eich proves it. But that must not surprise anyone, for a person becomes a liberal when they decide in their youth that they can lie to themselves and it doesn’t matter. When you lie to yourself, it is nothing to lie to others. You end up affiliating with people who like the same lies. You take pride in your common lies, for you cannot appeal to truth. Indeed, truth itself becomes a tool and a tactic that only exists to advance your agenda. Otherwise, truth itself is malleable and plastic. And then when dealing with people who do not share your common lies is by what power you can gain over them, for you cannot appeal to principle, at least not honestly.
[1] See for example,
DVD Review: STONEWALL UPRISING (PBS)
http://www.stageandcinema.com/2011/04/23/stonewall-uprising/
Multicultural pieties are an ideological weapon, designed to paralyze societal defenders. They are not the unintended consequences of goofy good intentions, but deliberately honed tools of political power, wielded without good intentions of any sort.
— Glenn Reynolds
Time to pass wind there fella. Here follows part of a post on an earlier thread:
First of all, sexual expression is a powerful compulsion. Genesis 6 teaches how even G_d’s angels couldn’t restrain themselves from responding to the temptation of all those babe-ulous human females. There is no doubt that people are hard wired to produce hormonal and physical responses to visual, auditory, olfactory, and tactile inputs accordingly, with lots of cognitive feedbacks that amplify those responses that themselves become inputs (else why would anyone masturbate?).
Those (sexual) compulsions compete with commercial, intellectual, social, and educational inputs. They make cooperation with a person more difficult. Lack of cooperation increases conflict. Conflict requires resolution. Enforcing settlements requires authority backed by physical power sufficient to override those sexual compulsions. The more sexually crazed a society becomes, the more conflict results, and the more centralized power becomes necessary to maintain order. This is why socialists seek to destroy self government via promoting sexualized children.
Sexualized people do not focus well on work. They have conflicts and traumas that require remedial education, counseling, “conflict resolution,” policing, adjudication, prison guards, parole officers, welfare case workers… i.e., they “make jobs” for unionized Democrat thugs. Thus they concentrate power. The more power becomes concentrated, the more easily one can sell favors to the highest bidder, the more the bidders control the government for their own ends and at the expense of everybody else. This means you.
Now perhaps you understand why it was the Rockefeller Foundation that funded and promoted Alfred Kinsey’s “research” (he was in fact a sadomasochistic homosexual pedophile) and his ideological heirs that are still calling the shots on “sex education” in public schools to this day. This is the source of your ethic. Sexual expression outside one’s spouse is destructive to liberty. That is why it is prohibited in the Bible. The Biblical system required no government, no police, no army, no social welfare system, just teachers and judges. Got it now? OK, so we’re ready for Part III!
What do we do from here? In my humble opinion, it is the enforced uniformity from the Federal government that is the problem here. Were the States free to define their own moral laws, we would soon find out by natural law competition whether homosexual conduct leads to destruction. We would soon find out whether the isolation resulting from rigid criminalization of sexual depravity results in a happier more prosperous society. Federalism is the answer. After all, there is a big difference between taxes and the condition of roads in Utah versus California.
Hell hath no fury like a bitchy faggot scorned ...
That pretty rainbow flag shows which house down the street to tell your grandkids to stay away from. If it was a requirement rather than a choice to brag of their affliction they’d yell “discrimination”.
The Gaystapo wants to make People who don’t really care what they do into unabashed Supporters, or else.
Anyone remember the hoopla that followed after Sarah Palin used the word “Tolerate” when speaking of Gays?
OMG, how dare she Tolerate them? That isn’t good enough,
she should embrace their Lifestyle. She was labeled a Hater for being Tolerant.
Sorry Folks, it isn’t good enough to just Live and Let Live.