Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton
 
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan
 
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792
 
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams
 
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams
 

1 posted on 04/27/2015 12:43:46 PM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; MountainDad; aposiopetic; ...
    Ted Cruz Ping!

    If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.
    Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!

    CRUZ or LOSE!

2 posted on 04/27/2015 12:44:17 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

Rothschild had his mafia thugs kill the last president that tried that.


3 posted on 04/27/2015 12:46:27 PM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

Close the ‘loophole’ that allows the regulatory agencies to bypass congress!


4 posted on 04/27/2015 12:47:45 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

This election is literally Ted Cruz against the world.

The most corrupt evil centers of power on earth have their hands in America’s pockets now.

Cruz!


5 posted on 04/27/2015 12:48:45 PM PDT by Eddie01 (Liberals lie about everything all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

I can shoot all kinds of holes in the Flat Tax arguments.

But this is Ted Cruz, and I’ll take him along with his flat tax over anything else.

But ....

He will catch a whiff of HR 25 for sure.

In fact, has has already said he supports HR 25.


7 posted on 04/27/2015 12:51:17 PM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie
But some federal agency is going to have to collect taxes

True. Customs collects duties. But other then that, all we need is a couple of guys in an office who send 50 bills out: Let the States collect their dues for keeping the FedGov operating, and send them in annually.

Other then that, no need for a giant bureaucracy.

That's what the Founders planned. They had it right.

8 posted on 04/27/2015 12:55:44 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

I would prefer a national retail sales tax
(not necessarily the “fairtax” and it’s complicated “prebates”).

But a flat tax would just be an adjustment to the existing tax code,
and could be implemented by an act of congress, whereas
a national retail sales tax would require a constitutional amendment.


9 posted on 04/27/2015 12:58:47 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th ("We The People" have met the enemy; and he is "We The People".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

I do believe he would do that, and I don’t say that about any politician. The democrats will present this as stealing from the poor and giving to the rich. Hopefully Cruz team will come up with a simple one liner to get low info voters on board.


12 posted on 04/27/2015 1:02:22 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie
I think in the end, Cruz sees the income tax code as an undecipherable circa 75,000 page mess that is rife with political corruption and costs Americans a shocking US$1 TRILLION per year in compliance and economic opportunity costs--small wonder why the recovery from the 2008 stock market crash is mostly limited to the technology and financial sectors (and only to a somewhat lesser extent the biotech sector).

We need a complete rethink of national taxation to create a true, broad-based economic growth for the future. That will require first going to the flat tax plan Steve Forbes proposed in 1996, then put into place the structure to finally phase out the income tax within 3-4 years afterward (including repealing the 16th Amendment) and replacing it with something like FairTax (Cruz has expressed interest in FairTax recently).

Imagine US$900+ billion per year freed up for economic activities and not more taxes on the process of earning money. The result would be an economic boom on a scale that would far surpass the economic boom of the 1980's.

17 posted on 04/27/2015 1:19:13 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

“In its purest form, a “flat tax” treats all taxpayers equally. Income is taxed at the same rate regardless of earnings or wealth, while allowing for no tax deductions or exemptions. But Cruz said his flat tax proposal might allow some deductions, possibly for popular write-offs like for charitable donations and mortgage interest charged on a primary residence, paid annually by homeowners.”

When you allow even one carve out, here come the special interest lobbyists. Better to bite the bullet and say no exceptions. That let’s you get the standard tax rate to the lowest possible level for everyone, while playing no favorites.


19 posted on 04/27/2015 1:23:51 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie
Unlike his plans for tax reform, which would presumably require congressional sign-off, Cruz said he could pursue a significant amount of regulatory reform through his executive authority, and that he would do so aggressively during his first 100 days as president.

A vast fraction of regulatory "law" is by consent decree in Federal court. I don't see how Cruz is going to undo that without the kind of autocracy he despises.

21 posted on 04/27/2015 2:02:13 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to manage by government regulation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

From the article: “In its purest form, a ‘flat tax’ treats all taxpayers equally. Income is taxed at the same rate regardless of earnings or wealth, while allowing for no tax deductions or exemptions. But Cruz said his flat tax proposal might allow some deductions, possibly for popular write-offs like for charitable donations and mortgage interest charged on a primary residence, paid annually by homeowners.
“We will roll it out with precise details in the coming weeks or months,” he said. “There are trade-offs to be had and we’re right now internally having those debates, in terms of whether you have a couple of deductions or exemptions or not, at what rate the flat rate is set, what level of standard deductions and so those trade-offs we’re currently debating.”

And, therein lies the fundamental flaw with an income tax...the leviathan cannot avoid the urge to ‘tweak’ it, to address ‘inequities based on perception’, to make some folks more equal than others.

Rather we should be looking into consumption based taxation, ala the Fair Tax (without that silly ‘prebate’ notion, IMO). Couple that with a requirement for 75% approval in the Senate and House before changes can be made.

A great many folks decry the ‘double taxation’ associated to spending accrued retirement savings in this model. That can be addressed in a couple of different ways, IMO, and would be sunsetted at a date certain in the future.

Time to put the entire IRS out to pasture...


22 posted on 04/27/2015 2:21:07 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2017; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie
"Cruz said he envisions shifting the tracking and collection of federal taxes to "some much smaller division" of the Treasury Department. The senator said that replacing the current, complex tax code with a simple flat tax would eliminate most of the work the IRS needs to do, making the agency obsolete and "irrelevant."

I have a CPA and aEnrolled Agent Gnome in my social circles, they have told me...

* Make the Flat Tax and alternative to the current system, side by side, it will be the only way it will pass and it will be adopted over-time ( from the E.A.)
* The CPA has changed their mind and is for a new system as they noted they will change their practice to help Small Businesses do the right things with their new Profits in this Cruzian world.

Bring on the change, it will be all good....

23 posted on 04/27/2015 2:24:28 PM PDT by taildragger (It's Cruz, Pence, or Walker. Anything else is a Yugo with Racing Stripes....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie
"We will roll it out with precise details in the coming weeks or months," he said. "There are trade-offs to be had and we're right now internally having those debates, in terms of whether you have a couple of deductions or exemptions or not, at what rate the flat rate is set, what level of standard deductions and so those trade-offs we're currently debating."

This election cycle just got more interesting.

35 posted on 04/27/2015 8:41:24 PM PDT by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

BTTT


37 posted on 04/27/2015 9:14:15 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

fl


38 posted on 04/27/2015 11:17:59 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ( million ii, all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie

Cruz had best get such changes off to a running start before becoming POTUSA.


39 posted on 04/27/2015 11:24:42 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson