[TurboZamboni]

6.4%

Even more outrageous than most typical leftist 'non-profits'.

[GOPJ]

Chatwal allegedly helped arrange one of Bill Clinton’s most lucrative public speeches — a $450,000 affair in London — and once said, “Even my close friend Hillary Clinton was not in favor of the deal [in 2006] … But when I put the whole package together, she also came on board. … In politics nothing comes free. You have to write cheques in the American political system.”

With the Clintons marks have to pay to use the toilet paper in the 25 cent bathroom stall...

[GOPJ]

Chatwal allegedly helped arrange one of Bill Clinton’s most lucrative public speeches — a $450,000 affair in London — and once said, “Even my close friend Hillary Clinton was not in favor of the deal [in 2006] … But when I put the whole package together, she also came on board. … In politics nothing comes free. You have to write cheques in the American political system.”

With the Clintons marks have to pay to use the toilet paper in the 25 cent bathroom stall...

[GeronL]

wrong

They are just shifting donations to her campaign

[JPG]

6.4%

Remember, they have salaries to pay, palms to grease, bennies to provide, rent, 1st class travel, 5 star hotels, gourmet food....it isn't cheap to be 'generous'.

[Fungi]

Too funny! My heart bleeds...as if they do not have enough money already. Hey, Hildabeast—you have enough money, why do you want to be president? It is all about power, the corrupting influence of power. We have had enough of the Clinton Crime Corruption Legacy. No Hildabeast, you will never be president, precluding the possibility of furthering our fall into the evil pit of socialism, an anachronism for communism.

[KarlInOhio]

They might just be betting against her now. If they don't expect her to win she has nothing left to sell except perhaps her silence.

No one puts money down on the horse with a broken leg.

[PGalt]

The Scent of a Sociopath.

[sickoflibs]

RE:”Actually, the fact that so little goes to charity — and that the rate (6.4% in 2013) has become so public — is what has them rethinking their commitments:”

93.6% of donations to Clinton foundation are spent by them on themselves, overhead, management perks and salaries, etc, only 6.4% goes to the causes that they are raised for.

Is there a charity in history with this bad of a record??

OK, the Federal government could tie with them.

Suckers!

[VerySadAmerican]

They’ll keep giving once this blows over. They know how vindictive the Clintons are. If she gets in the white house those donors who stopped giving are in for a world of hurt and they know it.

[mom.mom]

If I were one of the purchasers of Clinton influence, I would be concerned that there are so many doing this. What are the chances that they will perform my favor? What if my favor conflicts with someone else’s? Are there auctions?

[sport]

Baloney!

[bert]

The charity is in reality a shadow government of the various clinton lackeys. The money pays them to be ready to go on the day of the inauguration.

[lowbridge]

“the fact that so little goes to charity — and that the rate (6.4% in 2013) has become so public — is what has them rethinking their commitments:”

Or they just dont want their purchases of public officials being made public